lucenenet-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Itamar Syn-Hershko <ita...@code972.com>
Subject Re: [Lucene.Net] 2.9.4
Date Wed, 07 Sep 2011 10:03:44 GMT
Ok, core compiles, and all tests pass. We are now running long tests to
measure memory usage among other things.

There is one show stopper tho. There was a patch sent by Matt Warren for
Spatial.Net, that doesn't seem to be in. See
http://groups.google.com/group/ravendb/msg/7517f095810c48f3

Any chance you can get it in to 2.9.4?

On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 1:01 AM, Itamar Syn-Hershko <itamar@code972.com>wrote:

> Ok, great, we will run RavenDB on top of 2.9.4 in the next few days and
> will let you know how it went.
>
>
> On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 8:59 PM, Michael Herndon <
> mherndon@wickedsoftware.net> wrote:
>
>> I can't tell if the apache git mirror is updated via scheduler or from
>> commit hooks, but its generally stays close to being on par with svn.
>>  I'll
>> check next time I push something to svn.
>>
>> But both of those items have made it to the mirror.
>>
>> - michael
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 1:44 PM, Digy <digydigy@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> > I don't know how often github mirror is updated.
>> > These are the original locations
>> > 2.9.4  https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/lucene.net/trunk/
>> > 2.9.4g
>> >
>> >
>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/lucene.net/branches/Lucene.Net_2_
>> > 9_4g/
>> >
>> > Both versions include ThreadLocal fix + Signing.
>> >
>> > Thanks,
>> > DIGY
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > -----Original Message-----
>> > From: itamar.synhershko@gmail.com [mailto:itamar.synhershko@gmail.com]
>> On
>> > Behalf Of Itamar Syn-Hershko
>> > Sent: Tuesday, September 06, 2011 2:34 AM
>> > To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org
>> > Subject: Re: [Lucene.Net] 2.9.4
>> >
>> > Not a problem, we will test RavenDB on a separate branch, also for
>> > potential
>> > memory leaks
>> >
>> > Digy, can you make sure the github mirror contains an updated 2.9.4 tag
>> I
>> > can pull from, which includes the latest ThreadLocal fix + the strongly
>> > signed patch applied to it?
>> >
>> > 2011/9/6 Digy <digydigy@gmail.com>
>> >
>> > > To avoid misunderstanding...
>> > >
>> > > Community==all Lucene.Net users
>> > >
>> > > DIGY
>> > >
>> > > -----Original Message-----
>> > > From: Digy [mailto:digydigy@gmail.com]
>> > > Sent: Monday, September 05, 2011 11:46 PM
>> > > To: 'lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org'
>> > > Subject: RE: [Lucene.Net] 2.9.4
>> > >
>> > > Not bad idea, but I would prefer community's feedback instead of
>> testing
>> > > against all projects using Lucene.Net
>> > > DIGY
>> > >
>> > > -----Original Message-----
>> > > From: Matt Warren [mailto:mattdebs@gmail.com]
>> > > Sent: Monday, September 05, 2011 11:09 PM
>> > > To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org
>> > > Subject: Re: [Lucene.Net] 2.9.4
>> > >
>> > > If you want to test it against a large project you could take a look
>> at
>> > how
>> > > RavenDB uses it?
>> > >
>> > > At the moment it's using 2.9.2 (
>> > >
>> > >
>> >
>> >
>> https://github.com/ayende/ravendb/tree/master/SharedLibs/Sources/Lucene2.9.2
>> > > )
>> > > but if you were to recompile it against 2.9.4 and check that all it's
>> > > unit-tests still run that would give you quite a large test case.
>> > >
>> > > On 5 September 2011 19:22, Prescott Nasser <geobmx540@hotmail.com>
>> > wrote:
>> > >
>> > > >
>> > > > Hey All,
>> > > >
>> > > > How do people feel about the 2.9.4 code base? I've been using it for
>> > > > sometime, for my use cases it's be excellent. Do we feel we are
>> ready
>> > to
>> > > > package this up and make it an official release? Or do we have some
>> > tasks
>> > > > left to take care of?
>> > > >
>> > > > ~Prescott
>> > >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>>
>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message