lucenenet-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Itamar Syn-Hershko <ita...@code972.com>
Subject Re: [Lucene.Net] 2.9.4
Date Wed, 07 Sep 2011 09:17:09 GMT
What version is going to make it to nuget? 2.9.4 or 2.9.4g?

2011/9/7 digy digy <digydigy@gmail.com>

> You are right. I forgot to add a patch related with type-casting.
>
> Summary of the long story:
>
> Since CharArraySet inherits from Hashtable, some unimplemented methods such
> as Add(object,object) refer to the base class(Hashtable) which is wrong.
>
> Also calling GetEnumerator() using the
> System.Collections.ICollection interface does result in Hashtable's
> GetEnumerator() being invoked. So an explicit typecast is needed for
> invoking CharArraySet.GetEnumerator()
>
> (As a result, a bad (but *almost* working) implementation.  It is rewritten
> in 2.9.4g)
>
> DIGY
>
>
> On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 4:11 AM, Prescott Nasser <geobmx540@hotmail.com
> >wrote:
>
> >
> > Also +1 - but I don't mind waiting to hear back regarding the RavenDB
> stuff
> > - but we can prepare assuming it's all good.
> >
> >
> >
> > Digy can you elaborate on 414 (
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-414). I must not have
> > understood the complaint/question as adding that one method to me doesn't
> > seem to resolve the issue brought up
> >
> >
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > ~P
> >
> > ----------------------------------------
> > > From: digydigy@gmail.com
> > > To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org
> > > Date: Tue, 6 Sep 2011 23:14:37 +0300
> > > Subject: RE: [Lucene.Net] 2.9.4
> > >
> > > +1 for an official release.
> > > DIGY
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Prescott Nasser [mailto:geobmx540@hotmail.com]
> > > Sent: Monday, September 05, 2011 9:22 PM
> > > To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org;
> lucene-net-user@lucene.apache.org
> > > Subject: [Lucene.Net] 2.9.4
> > >
> > >
> > > Hey All,
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > How do people feel about the 2.9.4 code base? I've been using it for
> > > sometime, for my use cases it's be excellent. Do we feel we are ready
> to
> > > package this up and make it an official release? Or do we have some
> tasks
> > > left to take care of?
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > ~Prescott =
> > > -----
> > > Bu iletide virüs bulunamadı.
> > > AVG tarafından kontrol edildi - www.avg.com
> > > Sürüm: 2012.0.1796 / Virüs Veritabanı: 2082/4478 - Sürüm Tarihi:
> > 05.09.2011
> > >
> >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message