lucenenet-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Michael Herndon <mhern...@wickedsoftware.net>
Subject Re: [Lucene.Net] 2.9.4
Date Wed, 07 Sep 2011 12:12:47 GMT
> What version is going to make it to nuget? 2.9.4 or 2.9.4g?
ooo totally forgot about nuget. we definitely need to get that setup.


On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 6:46 AM, digy digy <digydigy@gmail.com> wrote:

> Since it includes some level of divergence from java I committed it to only
> 2.9.4g branch.
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1930
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-431
>
> DIGY
>
> On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 1:03 PM, Itamar Syn-Hershko <itamar@code972.com
> >wrote:
>
> > Ok, core compiles, and all tests pass. We are now running long tests to
> > measure memory usage among other things.
> >
> > There is one show stopper tho. There was a patch sent by Matt Warren for
> > Spatial.Net, that doesn't seem to be in. See
> > http://groups.google.com/group/ravendb/msg/7517f095810c48f3
> >
> > Any chance you can get it in to 2.9.4?
> >
> > On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 1:01 AM, Itamar Syn-Hershko <itamar@code972.com
> > >wrote:
> >
> > > Ok, great, we will run RavenDB on top of 2.9.4 in the next few days and
> > > will let you know how it went.
> > >
> > >
> > > On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 8:59 PM, Michael Herndon <
> > > mherndon@wickedsoftware.net> wrote:
> > >
> > >> I can't tell if the apache git mirror is updated via scheduler or from
> > >> commit hooks, but its generally stays close to being on par with svn.
> > >>  I'll
> > >> check next time I push something to svn.
> > >>
> > >> But both of those items have made it to the mirror.
> > >>
> > >> - michael
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 1:44 PM, Digy <digydigy@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> > I don't know how often github mirror is updated.
> > >> > These are the original locations
> > >> > 2.9.4  https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/lucene.net/trunk/
> > >> > 2.9.4g
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >>
> >
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/lucene.net/branches/Lucene.Net_2_
> > >> > 9_4g/
> > >> >
> > >> > Both versions include ThreadLocal fix + Signing.
> > >> >
> > >> > Thanks,
> > >> > DIGY
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> > -----Original Message-----
> > >> > From: itamar.synhershko@gmail.com [mailto:
> itamar.synhershko@gmail.com
> > ]
> > >> On
> > >> > Behalf Of Itamar Syn-Hershko
> > >> > Sent: Tuesday, September 06, 2011 2:34 AM
> > >> > To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org
> > >> > Subject: Re: [Lucene.Net] 2.9.4
> > >> >
> > >> > Not a problem, we will test RavenDB on a separate branch, also for
> > >> > potential
> > >> > memory leaks
> > >> >
> > >> > Digy, can you make sure the github mirror contains an updated 2.9.4
> > tag
> > >> I
> > >> > can pull from, which includes the latest ThreadLocal fix + the
> > strongly
> > >> > signed patch applied to it?
> > >> >
> > >> > 2011/9/6 Digy <digydigy@gmail.com>
> > >> >
> > >> > > To avoid misunderstanding...
> > >> > >
> > >> > > Community==all Lucene.Net users
> > >> > >
> > >> > > DIGY
> > >> > >
> > >> > > -----Original Message-----
> > >> > > From: Digy [mailto:digydigy@gmail.com]
> > >> > > Sent: Monday, September 05, 2011 11:46 PM
> > >> > > To: 'lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org'
> > >> > > Subject: RE: [Lucene.Net] 2.9.4
> > >> > >
> > >> > > Not bad idea, but I would prefer community's feedback instead
of
> > >> testing
> > >> > > against all projects using Lucene.Net
> > >> > > DIGY
> > >> > >
> > >> > > -----Original Message-----
> > >> > > From: Matt Warren [mailto:mattdebs@gmail.com]
> > >> > > Sent: Monday, September 05, 2011 11:09 PM
> > >> > > To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org
> > >> > > Subject: Re: [Lucene.Net] 2.9.4
> > >> > >
> > >> > > If you want to test it against a large project you could take
a
> look
> > >> at
> > >> > how
> > >> > > RavenDB uses it?
> > >> > >
> > >> > > At the moment it's using 2.9.2 (
> > >> > >
> > >> > >
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >>
> >
> https://github.com/ayende/ravendb/tree/master/SharedLibs/Sources/Lucene2.9.2
> > >> > > )
> > >> > > but if you were to recompile it against 2.9.4 and check that
all
> > it's
> > >> > > unit-tests still run that would give you quite a large test case.
> > >> > >
> > >> > > On 5 September 2011 19:22, Prescott Nasser <geobmx540@hotmail.com
> >
> > >> > wrote:
> > >> > >
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > Hey All,
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > How do people feel about the 2.9.4 code base? I've been
using it
> > for
> > >> > > > sometime, for my use cases it's be excellent. Do we feel
we are
> > >> ready
> > >> > to
> > >> > > > package this up and make it an official release? Or do we
have
> > some
> > >> > tasks
> > >> > > > left to take care of?
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > ~Prescott
> > >> > >
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >>
> > >
> > >
> >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message