lucenenet-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Michael Herndon <mhern...@wickedsoftware.net>
Subject Re: [Lucene.Net] 2.9.4
Date Wed, 07 Sep 2011 03:53:41 GMT
Should we put together a quick release checklist ?

 * I know that jira 407 mentions putting out a 2.9.2 build that is signed
when releasing 2.9.4

 * We should be able to build a chm & doc website using sandcastle.    The
downside is the website that gets built now requires asp.net instead of just
vanilla HTML and I have yet to find an option that allows just HTML.
Depending on what we do with this, we would need to remove the link to the
docs in the README file inside of trunk.

* Stefan Bodewig might still be away and I think we need his vote on the
release when the time comes. (correct me, because I could be uber wrong).

If there is anything that requires work and you think I can help with in
order to get this release out the door, just let me know.

- Michael



On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 9:11 PM, Prescott Nasser <geobmx540@hotmail.com>wrote:

>
> Also +1 - but I don't mind waiting to hear back regarding the RavenDB stuff
> - but we can prepare assuming it's all good.
>
>
>
> Digy can you elaborate on 414 (
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-414). I must not have
> understood the complaint/question as adding that one method to me doesn't
> seem to resolve the issue brought up
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> ~P
>
> ----------------------------------------
> > From: digydigy@gmail.com
> > To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org
> > Date: Tue, 6 Sep 2011 23:14:37 +0300
> > Subject: RE: [Lucene.Net] 2.9.4
> >
> > +1 for an official release.
> > DIGY
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Prescott Nasser [mailto:geobmx540@hotmail.com]
> > Sent: Monday, September 05, 2011 9:22 PM
> > To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org; lucene-net-user@lucene.apache.org
> > Subject: [Lucene.Net] 2.9.4
> >
> >
> > Hey All,
> >
> >
> >
> > How do people feel about the 2.9.4 code base? I've been using it for
> > sometime, for my use cases it's be excellent. Do we feel we are ready to
> > package this up and make it an official release? Or do we have some tasks
> > left to take care of?
> >
> >
> >
> > ~Prescott =
> > -----
> > Bu iletide virüs bulunamadı.
> > AVG tarafından kontrol edildi - www.avg.com
> > Sürüm: 2012.0.1796 / Virüs Veritabanı: 2082/4478 - Sürüm Tarihi:
> 05.09.2011
> >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message