lucenenet-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From digy digy <digyd...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [Lucene.Net] 2.9.4
Date Wed, 07 Sep 2011 10:46:28 GMT
Since it includes some level of divergence from java I committed it to only
2.9.4g branch.

https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1930
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-431

DIGY

On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 1:03 PM, Itamar Syn-Hershko <itamar@code972.com>wrote:

> Ok, core compiles, and all tests pass. We are now running long tests to
> measure memory usage among other things.
>
> There is one show stopper tho. There was a patch sent by Matt Warren for
> Spatial.Net, that doesn't seem to be in. See
> http://groups.google.com/group/ravendb/msg/7517f095810c48f3
>
> Any chance you can get it in to 2.9.4?
>
> On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 1:01 AM, Itamar Syn-Hershko <itamar@code972.com
> >wrote:
>
> > Ok, great, we will run RavenDB on top of 2.9.4 in the next few days and
> > will let you know how it went.
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 8:59 PM, Michael Herndon <
> > mherndon@wickedsoftware.net> wrote:
> >
> >> I can't tell if the apache git mirror is updated via scheduler or from
> >> commit hooks, but its generally stays close to being on par with svn.
> >>  I'll
> >> check next time I push something to svn.
> >>
> >> But both of those items have made it to the mirror.
> >>
> >> - michael
> >>
> >>
> >> On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 1:44 PM, Digy <digydigy@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> > I don't know how often github mirror is updated.
> >> > These are the original locations
> >> > 2.9.4  https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/lucene.net/trunk/
> >> > 2.9.4g
> >> >
> >> >
> >>
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/lucene.net/branches/Lucene.Net_2_
> >> > 9_4g/
> >> >
> >> > Both versions include ThreadLocal fix + Signing.
> >> >
> >> > Thanks,
> >> > DIGY
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > -----Original Message-----
> >> > From: itamar.synhershko@gmail.com [mailto:itamar.synhershko@gmail.com
> ]
> >> On
> >> > Behalf Of Itamar Syn-Hershko
> >> > Sent: Tuesday, September 06, 2011 2:34 AM
> >> > To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org
> >> > Subject: Re: [Lucene.Net] 2.9.4
> >> >
> >> > Not a problem, we will test RavenDB on a separate branch, also for
> >> > potential
> >> > memory leaks
> >> >
> >> > Digy, can you make sure the github mirror contains an updated 2.9.4
> tag
> >> I
> >> > can pull from, which includes the latest ThreadLocal fix + the
> strongly
> >> > signed patch applied to it?
> >> >
> >> > 2011/9/6 Digy <digydigy@gmail.com>
> >> >
> >> > > To avoid misunderstanding...
> >> > >
> >> > > Community==all Lucene.Net users
> >> > >
> >> > > DIGY
> >> > >
> >> > > -----Original Message-----
> >> > > From: Digy [mailto:digydigy@gmail.com]
> >> > > Sent: Monday, September 05, 2011 11:46 PM
> >> > > To: 'lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org'
> >> > > Subject: RE: [Lucene.Net] 2.9.4
> >> > >
> >> > > Not bad idea, but I would prefer community's feedback instead of
> >> testing
> >> > > against all projects using Lucene.Net
> >> > > DIGY
> >> > >
> >> > > -----Original Message-----
> >> > > From: Matt Warren [mailto:mattdebs@gmail.com]
> >> > > Sent: Monday, September 05, 2011 11:09 PM
> >> > > To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org
> >> > > Subject: Re: [Lucene.Net] 2.9.4
> >> > >
> >> > > If you want to test it against a large project you could take a look
> >> at
> >> > how
> >> > > RavenDB uses it?
> >> > >
> >> > > At the moment it's using 2.9.2 (
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> >
> >> >
> >>
> https://github.com/ayende/ravendb/tree/master/SharedLibs/Sources/Lucene2.9.2
> >> > > )
> >> > > but if you were to recompile it against 2.9.4 and check that all
> it's
> >> > > unit-tests still run that would give you quite a large test case.
> >> > >
> >> > > On 5 September 2011 19:22, Prescott Nasser <geobmx540@hotmail.com>
> >> > wrote:
> >> > >
> >> > > >
> >> > > > Hey All,
> >> > > >
> >> > > > How do people feel about the 2.9.4 code base? I've been using
it
> for
> >> > > > sometime, for my use cases it's be excellent. Do we feel we are
> >> ready
> >> > to
> >> > > > package this up and make it an official release? Or do we have
> some
> >> > tasks
> >> > > > left to take care of?
> >> > > >
> >> > > > ~Prescott
> >> > >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >>
> >
> >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message