lucenenet-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Wyatt Barnett <wyatt.barn...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [Lucene.Net] Is a Lucene.Net Line-by-Line Jave port needed?
Date Wed, 29 Jun 2011 19:56:53 GMT
Those are pretty strong words -- I'd really like to know why I
shouldn't trust anything but a line-by-line port. Can you explain a
bit?

On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 3:47 PM, Granroth, Neal V.
<neal.granroth@thermofisher.com> wrote:
> This is has been discussed many times.
> Lucene.NET is not valid, the code cannot be trusted, if it is not a line-by-line port.
 It ceases to be Lucene.
>
> - Neal
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Scott Lombard [mailto:lombardenator@gmail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, June 29, 2011 1:58 PM
> To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org; lucene-net-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: [Lucene.Net] Is a Lucene.Net Line-by-Line Jave port needed?
>
>
>
> After the large community response about moving the code base from .Net 2.0
> to Net 4.0 I am trying to figure out what is the need for a line-by-line
> port.  Starting with Digy's excellent work on the conversion to generics a
> priority of the 2.9.4g release is the 2 packages would not be
> interchangeable.  So faster turnaround from a java release won't matter to
> non line-by-line users they will have to wait until the updates are made to
> the non line-by-line code base.
>
>
>
> My question is there really a user base for the line-by-line port?  Anyone
> have a comment?
>
>
>
> Scott
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

Mime
View raw message