lucenenet-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Michael Herndon <mhern...@wickedsoftware.net>
Subject Re: [Lucene.Net] Is a Lucene.Net Line-by-Line Jave port needed?
Date Wed, 29 Jun 2011 20:16:32 GMT
For the sake of continued conversation, Scott could you define what you mean
by line-by-line port vs non-line-by-line port since technically your the
thread starter?







On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 3:58 PM, Digy <digydigy@gmail.com> wrote:

> As a Lucene.Net user I wouldn't care whether it is line-by-line port or
> not.
>
> But as a contributer, I would prefer a parallel code that makes the life
> easier for manual ports of new releases(until this process is automated)
>
> PS: I presume no one thinks of functional or index-level incompatibility.
>
> DIGY
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Granroth, Neal V. [mailto:neal.granroth@thermofisher.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, June 29, 2011 10:47 PM
> To: lucene-net-user@lucene.apache.org
> Cc: lucene-net-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: RE: [Lucene.Net] Is a Lucene.Net Line-by-Line Jave port needed?
>
> This is has been discussed many times.
> Lucene.NET is not valid, the code cannot be trusted, if it is not a
> line-by-line port.  It ceases to be Lucene.
>
> - Neal
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Scott Lombard [mailto:lombardenator@gmail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, June 29, 2011 1:58 PM
> To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org; lucene-net-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: [Lucene.Net] Is a Lucene.Net Line-by-Line Jave port needed?
>
>
>
> After the large community response about moving the code base from .Net 2.0
> to Net 4.0 I am trying to figure out what is the need for a line-by-line
> port.  Starting with Digy's excellent work on the conversion to generics a
> priority of the 2.9.4g release is the 2 packages would not be
> interchangeable.  So faster turnaround from a java release won't matter to
> non line-by-line users they will have to wait until the updates are made to
> the non line-by-line code base.
>
>
>
> My question is there really a user base for the line-by-line port?  Anyone
> have a comment?
>
>
>
> Scott
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message