lucenenet-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Granroth, Neal V." <neal.granr...@thermofisher.com>
Subject RE: [Lucene.Net] Is a Lucene.Net Line-by-Line Jave port needed?
Date Wed, 29 Jun 2011 20:09:06 GMT
Others have done a much better , more through job of explaining the issues in previous discussions.
 It would be best to re-read those.

One way to understand it, is if Lucene.NET cannot be compared to the reference source code
(Lucene core "java Lucene") than it becomes nearly impossible to validate that Lucene.NET
is functioning correctly, that bug fixes made in Lucene core have been implemented in Lucene.NET,
etc.  The same goes for unit tests, if they cannot be compared with the ones from Lucene core
line-by-line than there is no way to know that they perform the intended tests and run correctly.


- Neal
 

-----Original Message-----
From: Wyatt Barnett [mailto:wyatt.barnett@gmail.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, June 29, 2011 2:57 PM
To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: [Lucene.Net] Is a Lucene.Net Line-by-Line Jave port needed?

Those are pretty strong words -- I'd really like to know why I
shouldn't trust anything but a line-by-line port. Can you explain a
bit?

On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 3:47 PM, Granroth, Neal V.
<neal.granroth@thermofisher.com> wrote:
> This is has been discussed many times.
> Lucene.NET is not valid, the code cannot be trusted, if it is not a line-by-line port.
 It ceases to be Lucene.
>
> - Neal
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Scott Lombard [mailto:lombardenator@gmail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, June 29, 2011 1:58 PM
> To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org; lucene-net-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: [Lucene.Net] Is a Lucene.Net Line-by-Line Jave port needed?
>
>
>
> After the large community response about moving the code base from .Net 2.0
> to Net 4.0 I am trying to figure out what is the need for a line-by-line
> port.  Starting with Digy's excellent work on the conversion to generics a
> priority of the 2.9.4g release is the 2 packages would not be
> interchangeable.  So faster turnaround from a java release won't matter to
> non line-by-line users they will have to wait until the updates are made to
> the non line-by-line code base.
>
>
>
> My question is there really a user base for the line-by-line port?  Anyone
> have a comment?
>
>
>
> Scott
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

Mime
View raw message