lucenenet-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Granroth, Neal V." <>
Subject RE: [Lucene.Net] Is a Lucene.Net Line-by-Line Jave port needed?
Date Wed, 29 Jun 2011 19:47:03 GMT
This is has been discussed many times.
Lucene.NET is not valid, the code cannot be trusted, if it is not a line-by-line port.  It
ceases to be Lucene.

- Neal

-----Original Message-----
From: Scott Lombard [] 
Sent: Wednesday, June 29, 2011 1:58 PM
Subject: [Lucene.Net] Is a Lucene.Net Line-by-Line Jave port needed?


After the large community response about moving the code base from .Net 2.0
to Net 4.0 I am trying to figure out what is the need for a line-by-line
port.  Starting with Digy's excellent work on the conversion to generics a
priority of the 2.9.4g release is the 2 packages would not be
interchangeable.  So faster turnaround from a java release won't matter to
non line-by-line users they will have to wait until the updates are made to
the non line-by-line code base.  


My question is there really a user base for the line-by-line port?  Anyone
have a comment?






View raw message