lucenenet-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Digy" <digyd...@gmail.com>
Subject RE: [Lucene.Net] Is a Lucene.Net Line-by-Line Jave port needed?
Date Wed, 29 Jun 2011 19:58:07 GMT
As a Lucene.Net user I wouldn't care whether it is line-by-line port or not.

But as a contributer, I would prefer a parallel code that makes the life
easier for manual ports of new releases(until this process is automated)

PS: I presume no one thinks of functional or index-level incompatibility.

DIGY

-----Original Message-----
From: Granroth, Neal V. [mailto:neal.granroth@thermofisher.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, June 29, 2011 10:47 PM
To: lucene-net-user@lucene.apache.org
Cc: lucene-net-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: RE: [Lucene.Net] Is a Lucene.Net Line-by-Line Jave port needed?

This is has been discussed many times.
Lucene.NET is not valid, the code cannot be trusted, if it is not a
line-by-line port.  It ceases to be Lucene.

- Neal

-----Original Message-----
From: Scott Lombard [mailto:lombardenator@gmail.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, June 29, 2011 1:58 PM
To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org; lucene-net-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: [Lucene.Net] Is a Lucene.Net Line-by-Line Jave port needed?

 

After the large community response about moving the code base from .Net 2.0
to Net 4.0 I am trying to figure out what is the need for a line-by-line
port.  Starting with Digy's excellent work on the conversion to generics a
priority of the 2.9.4g release is the 2 packages would not be
interchangeable.  So faster turnaround from a java release won't matter to
non line-by-line users they will have to wait until the updates are made to
the non line-by-line code base.  

 

My question is there really a user base for the line-by-line port?  Anyone
have a comment?

 

Scott

 

  

 


Mime
View raw message