lucenenet-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Digy" <digyd...@gmail.com>
Subject RE: [Lucene.Net] Is a Lucene.Net Line-by-Line Jave port needed?
Date Wed, 29 Jun 2011 21:57:57 GMT
> I do not know if too much emphasis should be placed on "user" vs.
"contributor".  
I am sorry for this misunderstanding.
What I tried to say with "contributor"(not "committer") was the "people that
works on Lucene.Net source code", not the ones who just consume it.

DIGY

-----Original Message-----
From: Granroth, Neal V. [mailto:neal.granroth@thermofisher.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, June 29, 2011 11:23 PM
To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org
Subject: RE: [Lucene.Net] Is a Lucene.Net Line-by-Line Jave port needed?

I do not know if too much emphasis should be placed on "user" vs.
"contributor".  The project needs to also consider those of us who use
Lucene.NET source releases only.
It is much easier to locally patch/fix the source when I can compare it
directly to Lucene core.

- Neal
 

-----Original Message-----
From: Digy [mailto:digydigy@gmail.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, June 29, 2011 2:58 PM
To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org
Subject: RE: [Lucene.Net] Is a Lucene.Net Line-by-Line Jave port needed?

As a Lucene.Net user I wouldn't care whether it is line-by-line port or not.

But as a contributer, I would prefer a parallel code that makes the life
easier for manual ports of new releases(until this process is automated)

PS: I presume no one thinks of functional or index-level incompatibility.

DIGY

-----Original Message-----
From: Granroth, Neal V. [mailto:neal.granroth@thermofisher.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, June 29, 2011 10:47 PM
To: lucene-net-user@lucene.apache.org
Cc: lucene-net-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: RE: [Lucene.Net] Is a Lucene.Net Line-by-Line Jave port needed?

This is has been discussed many times.
Lucene.NET is not valid, the code cannot be trusted, if it is not a
line-by-line port.  It ceases to be Lucene.

- Neal

-----Original Message-----
From: Scott Lombard [mailto:lombardenator@gmail.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, June 29, 2011 1:58 PM
To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org; lucene-net-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: [Lucene.Net] Is a Lucene.Net Line-by-Line Jave port needed?

 

After the large community response about moving the code base from .Net 2.0
to Net 4.0 I am trying to figure out what is the need for a line-by-line
port.  Starting with Digy's excellent work on the conversion to generics a
priority of the 2.9.4g release is the 2 packages would not be
interchangeable.  So faster turnaround from a java release won't matter to
non line-by-line users they will have to wait until the updates are made to
the non line-by-line code base.  

 

My question is there really a user base for the line-by-line port?  Anyone
have a comment?

 

Scott

 

  

 


Mime
View raw message