lucenenet-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Prescott Nasser <geobmx...@hotmail.com>
Subject RE: [Lucene.Net] VOTE: .NET 2.0 Framework Support After Apache Lucene.Net 2.9.4
Date Tue, 10 May 2011 07:46:59 GMT

This is my +1 as well





----------------------------------------
> Date: Tue, 10 May 2011 09:24:07 +0200
> From: simone.chiaretta@gmail.com
> To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [Lucene.Net] VOTE: .NET 2.0 Framework Support After Apache Lucene.Net 2.9.4
>
> +1
> one option is that we could go forward with .NET 4, but still keep a "fix
> branch" that keeps the current .NET 2 based version free from bugs and
> security issues that ppl report.
>
> Simone
>
> On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 9:18 AM, Amanuel Workneh wrote:
>
> > +1 (According to Digy's suggestion)
> >
> >
> > On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 10:04 PM, Troy Howard wrote:
> > > All,
> > >
> > > Please cast your votes regarding the topic of .Net Framework support.
> > >
> > > The question on the table is:
> > >
> > > Should Apache Lucene.Net 2.9.4 be the last release which supports the
> > > .Net 2.0 Framework?
> > >
> > > Some options are:
> > >
> > > [+1] - Yes, move forward to the latest .Net Framework version, and drop
> > > support for 2.0 completely. New features and performance are more
> > important
> > > than backwards compatibility.
> > > [0] - Yes, focus on the latest .Net Framework, but also include patches
> > > and/or preprocessor directives and conditional compilation blocks to
> > include
> > > support for 2.0 when needed. New features, performance, and backwards
> > > compatibility are all equally important and it's worth the additional
> > > complexity and coding work to meet all of those goals.
> > > [-1] No, .Net Framework 2.0 should remain our target platform. Backwards
> > > compatibility is more important than new features and performance.
> > >
> > >
> > > This vote is not limited to the Apache Lucene.Net IPMC. All
> > > users/contributors/committers/mailing list lurkers are welcome to cast
> > their
> > > votes with an equal weight. This has been cross posted to both the dev
> > and
> > > user mailing lists.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Troy
> > >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Simone Chiaretta
> Microsoft MVP ASP.NET - ASPInsider
> Blog: http://codeclimber.net.nz
> RSS: http://feeds2.feedburner.com/codeclimber
> twitter: @simonech
>
> Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic
> "Life is short, play hard" 		 	   		  
Mime
View raw message