lucenenet-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Wyatt Barnett <wyatt.barn...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [Lucene.Net] Lucene.Net Hackathon (5/13-/516)
Date Wed, 11 May 2011 18:43:14 GMT
Retweeted. Though I doubt any of the ~100 people following me aren't in
the 36 following him . . .

On 5/11/11 2:39 PM, "Michael Herndon" <mherndon@wickedsoftware.net> wrote:

>If any of you follow Hanselman on twitter, please take a second a retweet
>his on the lucene.net hackathon listed below or even send a thanks.
>
>"Wanna get involved in Open Source? Why not help with the Lucene.NET
>HackAThon? http://hnsl.mn/lucenehackathon "
>
>Cheers,
>- Michael
>
>On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 7:12 PM, Troy Howard <thoward37@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Here's the wiki page:
>>
>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/x/Go6OAQ
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Troy
>>
>>
>> On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 1:59 PM, Troy Howard <thoward37@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > Michael,
>> >
>> > That worked!
>> >
>> > I'm in the process of making a wiki page for the event now.
>> >
>> > Thanks,
>> > Troy
>> >
>> >
>> > On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 1:38 PM, Michael Herndon
>> > <mherndon@wickedsoftware.net> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> log out and log back in and verify permission changes.
>> >>
>> >> On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 4:22 PM, Troy Howard <thoward37@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> > Re: "I'm not sure if there is a coding difference between the C#
>>stuff
>> and
>> >> > the other directory stuff."
>> >> >
>> >> > There are a few minor code changes in the new branch vs the C#
>>branch,
>> but
>> >> > those are things like framework target, copyright notices, etc.. I
>> didn't
>> >> > change code significantly, and unit tests still pass.
>> >> >
>> >> > Re: "we can probably branch C# to something like pre_NewStructure"
>> >> >
>> >> > I made a tag right before committing the directory changes for this
>> exact
>> >> > purpose. It's here:
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> 
>>https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/lucene.net/tags/pre-layout-cha
>>nge
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > Regarding the hackathon next week, I'd like to put together a list
>>of
>> tasks
>> >> > specifically for this weekend to give people some focus on where
>>they
>> can
>> >> > contribute. Some of these will be major tasks with high priority
>>(like
>> >> > finishing up the 2.9.4 release) and others will be of lower
>>priority
>> like
>> >> > working on the samples/wiki/website... Those will great skills in
>> creating
>> >> > GUI apps, but less skills with writing back-end libraries might
>>want
>> to
>> >> > contribute to Luke.Net, even if it's not a high priority.
>> >> >
>> >> > I agree with Michael that we should tweet/blog/wiki/mailing list
>>the
>> >> > details
>> >> > of the event. I would make a wiki page on the topic, but it seems I
>> don't
>> >> > have sufficient privileges on our Confluence wiki to do that. Can
>> whoever
>> >> > the admin is give me rights to add/edit wiki pages? My login is
>> 'thoward'.
>> >> >
>> >> > Thanks,
>> >> > Troy
>> >> >
>> >> > On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 1:15 AM, Prescott Nasser <
>> geobmx540@hotmail.com
>> >> > >wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> > >
>> >> > > I think Troy has the structure ready to roll - I'm not sure if
>>there
>> is a
>> >> > > coding difference between the C# stuff and the other directory
>> stuff. If
>> >> > > there isn't then we can probably branch C# to something like
>> >> > > pre_NewStructure (someone help me with a better name), then
>>remove
>> it
>> >> > from
>> >> > > the trunk.
>> >> > >
>> >> > > Troy I believe was investigating the legal task - perhaps he can
>> update
>> >> > us
>> >> > > if he ever got an answer
>> >> > >
>> >> > > If you want to jump into a smaller task take a look at
>> >> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-372 (currently
>> assigned
>> >> > to
>> >> > > me). I updated a ton of the analyers, but I believe them to be
>>out
>> of
>> >> > date
>> >> > > from the java 2.9.4 branch because I used the attached files from
>> Pasha
>> >> > > without paying attention to the age of them. So those could use
a
>> review.
>> >> > I
>> >> > > also never ported the test cases, which we definately should
>>have.
>> >> > >
>> >> > >
>> >> > >
>> >> > > ----------------------------------------
>> >> > > > Date: Mon, 9 May 2011 10:04:03 +0200
>> >> > > > From: mammo@rotselleri.com
>> >> > > > To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org
>> >> > > > Subject: Re: [Lucene.Net] Lucene.Net Hackathon (5/13-/516)
>> >> > > >
>> >> > > > On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 1:12 AM, Prescott Nasser wrote:
>> >> > > > >
>> >> > > > > +1 to getting 2.9.4 ready to roll + the changes to the
>>directory
>> >> > > structure we have
>> >> > > > > going
>> >> > > >
>> >> > > > +1 for 2.9.4 and directory structure.
>> >> > > > To make that happen, I'd like to know what needs to be done
>>and in
>> >> > > > what way I could be of any help. There are 10 open issues
for
>> 2.9.4,
>> >> > > > and (apart from the Luke issues mentioned below) none of
them
>> makes me
>> >> > > > feel that I can grab it and start coding.
>> >> > > >
>> >> > > > > -Sharpen stuff - I haven't had time to get it really
working
>> (not to
>> >> > > mention I don't know
>> >> > > > > eclipse from a hole in the ground). I haven't heard
from
>>Alex in
>> a
>> >> > > while, who I think is
>> >> > > > > the most knowledgeable on the subject.
>> >> > > >
>> >> > > > Also most important to get closer to the java version.
>> >> > > >
>> >> > > > > -.NET syntax.
>> >> > > > +1, the API often feels quite awkward to use.
>> >> > > >
>> >> > > > > That said, I think Luke is important. If we left with
the
>>idea
>> of you
>> >> > > could run Luke in
>> >> > > > > java just find, we could also just say use lucene/solr
and
>>the
>> api
>> >> > > provided, no need
>> >> > > > > for the Lucene.Net project. (I know it's a bit different).
>>That
>> said,
>> >> > I
>> >> > > don't think it's top
>> >> > > > > priority, but it would be nice to have a .net implimentation.
>> >> > > >
>> >> > > > Agree, it would be nice to have.
>> >> > > >
>> >> > > > > Sergey was working on a port of this in WPF - can he
perhaps
>> provide
>> >> > an
>> >> > > update on
>> >> > > > > what's going on with that? I think it was located at
bit
>>bucket
>> at
>> >> > one
>> >> > > point, and then I
>> >> > > > > lost track..
>> >> > > >
>> >> > > > The WPF track was abandoned due to absent WPF support in
mono.
>>I
>> >> > > > adopted code attached to LUCENET-391 by Pasha Bizhan and
it is
>> >> > > > continued on
>> >> > > > https://github.com/mammo/LukeSharp (mirror at
>> >> > > > https://bitbucket.org/mammo/lukesharp). Testing and reporting
>>of
>> >> > > > broken or missing features would be most appreciated.
>> >> > > >
>> >> > > > I am not sure how to resolve the Luke legal sub-task
>>LUCENET-397,
>> is
>> >> > > > it enough that Pasha has attached the code or is more paper
>>work
>> >> > > > required?
>> >> > > >
>> >> > > >
>> >> > > > /amanuel
>> >> > >
>> >> >
>> >
>>



Mime
View raw message