lucenenet-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Sergey Mirvoda <ser...@mirvoda.com>
Subject Re: [Lucene.Net] VOTE: .NET 2.0 Framework Support After Apache Lucene.Net 2.9.4
Date Thu, 12 May 2011 07:12:28 GMT
+1

On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 6:03 AM, Gregory Bell <Gregory.Bell@advansyscorp.com
> wrote:

> +1
>
> >>> Troy Howard <thoward37@gmail.com> 10/05/2011 7:44 AM >>>
> My goal with moving forward to .Net 4.0 specifically, is that with 4.0
> there are major improvements to the .NET GC, which we have already
> found in our company's testing, improves Lucene.Net's memory
> management and overall speed significantly. This is without any code
> changes, just compiling for .Net 4.0 framework target vs 2.0 or 3.5...
>
> Thanks,
> Troy
>
>
> On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 2:40 PM, Aaron Powell <me@aaron-powell.com> wrote:
> > +1
> >
> > PS: If you are supporting .NET 3.5 then you get .NET 2.0 support anyway,
> you just have to bin-deploy the .NET 3.5 dependencies (System.Core, etc)
> since they are all the same CLR
> >
> > Aaron Powell
> > MVP - Internet Explorer (Development) | Umbraco Core Team Member |
> FunnelWeb Team Member
> >
> > http://apowell.me | http://twitter.com/slace | Skype: aaron.l.powell |
> MSN: aazzap@hotmail.com
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Troy Howard [mailto:thoward37@gmail.com]
> > Sent: Tuesday, 10 May 2011 6:05 AM
> > To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org; lucene-net-user@lucene.apache.org
> > Subject: [Lucene.Net] VOTE: .NET 2.0 Framework Support After Apache
> Lucene.Net 2.9.4
> >
> > All,
> >
> > Please cast your votes regarding the topic of .Net Framework support.
> >
> > The question on the table is:
> >
> > Should Apache Lucene.Net 2.9.4 be the last release which supports the
> .Net 2.0 Framework?
> >
> > Some options are:
> >
> > [+1] - Yes, move forward to the latest .Net Framework version, and drop
> support for 2.0 completely. New features and performance are more important
> than backwards compatibility.
> > [0] - Yes, focus on the latest .Net Framework, but also include patches
> and/or preprocessor directives and conditional compilation blocks to include
> support for 2.0 when needed. New features, performance, and backwards
> compatibility are all equally important and it's worth the additional
> complexity and coding work to meet all of those goals.
> > [-1] No, .Net Framework 2.0 should remain our target platform. Backwards
> compatibility is more important than new features and performance.
> >
> >
> > This vote is not limited to the Apache Lucene.Net IPMC. All
> users/contributors/committers/mailing list lurkers are welcome to cast their
> votes with an equal weight. This has been cross posted to both the dev and
> user mailing lists.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Troy
> >
>
>


-- 
--Regards, Sergey Mirvoda

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message