lucenenet-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Troy Howard <thowar...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [Lucene.Net] Lucene.Net Hackathon (5/13-/516)
Date Mon, 09 May 2011 23:12:28 GMT
Here's the wiki page:

https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/x/Go6OAQ

Thanks,
Troy


On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 1:59 PM, Troy Howard <thoward37@gmail.com> wrote:
> Michael,
>
> That worked!
>
> I'm in the process of making a wiki page for the event now.
>
> Thanks,
> Troy
>
>
> On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 1:38 PM, Michael Herndon
> <mherndon@wickedsoftware.net> wrote:
>>
>> log out and log back in and verify permission changes.
>>
>> On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 4:22 PM, Troy Howard <thoward37@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> > Re: "I'm not sure if there is a coding difference between the C# stuff and
>> > the other directory stuff."
>> >
>> > There are a few minor code changes in the new branch vs the C# branch, but
>> > those are things like framework target, copyright notices, etc.. I didn't
>> > change code significantly, and unit tests still pass.
>> >
>> > Re: "we can probably branch C# to something like pre_NewStructure"
>> >
>> > I made a tag right before committing the directory changes for this exact
>> > purpose. It's here:
>> >
>> >
>> > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/lucene.net/tags/pre-layout-change
>> >
>> >
>> > Regarding the hackathon next week, I'd like to put together a list of tasks
>> > specifically for this weekend to give people some focus on where they can
>> > contribute. Some of these will be major tasks with high priority (like
>> > finishing up the 2.9.4 release) and others will be of lower priority like
>> > working on the samples/wiki/website... Those will great skills in creating
>> > GUI apps, but less skills with writing back-end libraries might want to
>> > contribute to Luke.Net, even if it's not a high priority.
>> >
>> > I agree with Michael that we should tweet/blog/wiki/mailing list the
>> > details
>> > of the event. I would make a wiki page on the topic, but it seems I don't
>> > have sufficient privileges on our Confluence wiki to do that. Can whoever
>> > the admin is give me rights to add/edit wiki pages? My login is 'thoward'.
>> >
>> > Thanks,
>> > Troy
>> >
>> > On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 1:15 AM, Prescott Nasser <geobmx540@hotmail.com
>> > >wrote:
>> >
>> > >
>> > > I think Troy has the structure ready to roll - I'm not sure if there is
a
>> > > coding difference between the C# stuff and the other directory stuff. If
>> > > there isn't then we can probably branch C# to something like
>> > > pre_NewStructure (someone help me with a better name), then remove it
>> > from
>> > > the trunk.
>> > >
>> > > Troy I believe was investigating the legal task - perhaps he can update
>> > us
>> > > if he ever got an answer
>> > >
>> > > If you want to jump into a smaller task take a look at
>> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-372 (currently assigned
>> > to
>> > > me). I updated a ton of the analyers, but I believe them to be out of
>> > date
>> > > from the java 2.9.4 branch because I used the attached files from Pasha
>> > > without paying attention to the age of them. So those could use a review.
>> > I
>> > > also never ported the test cases, which we definately should have.
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > ----------------------------------------
>> > > > Date: Mon, 9 May 2011 10:04:03 +0200
>> > > > From: mammo@rotselleri.com
>> > > > To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org
>> > > > Subject: Re: [Lucene.Net] Lucene.Net Hackathon (5/13-/516)
>> > > >
>> > > > On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 1:12 AM, Prescott Nasser wrote:
>> > > > >
>> > > > > +1 to getting 2.9.4 ready to roll + the changes to the directory
>> > > structure we have
>> > > > > going
>> > > >
>> > > > +1 for 2.9.4 and directory structure.
>> > > > To make that happen, I'd like to know what needs to be done and in
>> > > > what way I could be of any help. There are 10 open issues for 2.9.4,
>> > > > and (apart from the Luke issues mentioned below) none of them makes
me
>> > > > feel that I can grab it and start coding.
>> > > >
>> > > > > -Sharpen stuff - I haven't had time to get it really working
(not to
>> > > mention I don't know
>> > > > > eclipse from a hole in the ground). I haven't heard from Alex
in a
>> > > while, who I think is
>> > > > > the most knowledgeable on the subject.
>> > > >
>> > > > Also most important to get closer to the java version.
>> > > >
>> > > > > -.NET syntax.
>> > > > +1, the API often feels quite awkward to use.
>> > > >
>> > > > > That said, I think Luke is important. If we left with the idea
of you
>> > > could run Luke in
>> > > > > java just find, we could also just say use lucene/solr and the
api
>> > > provided, no need
>> > > > > for the Lucene.Net project. (I know it's a bit different). That
said,
>> > I
>> > > don't think it's top
>> > > > > priority, but it would be nice to have a .net implimentation.
>> > > >
>> > > > Agree, it would be nice to have.
>> > > >
>> > > > > Sergey was working on a port of this in WPF - can he perhaps
provide
>> > an
>> > > update on
>> > > > > what's going on with that? I think it was located at bit bucket
at
>> > one
>> > > point, and then I
>> > > > > lost track..
>> > > >
>> > > > The WPF track was abandoned due to absent WPF support in mono. I
>> > > > adopted code attached to LUCENET-391 by Pasha Bizhan and it is
>> > > > continued on
>> > > > https://github.com/mammo/LukeSharp (mirror at
>> > > > https://bitbucket.org/mammo/lukesharp). Testing and reporting of
>> > > > broken or missing features would be most appreciated.
>> > > >
>> > > > I am not sure how to resolve the Luke legal sub-task LUCENET-397,
is
>> > > > it enough that Pasha has attached the code or is more paper work
>> > > > required?
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > /amanuel
>> > >
>> >
>

Mime
View raw message