lucenenet-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Michael Herndon <mhern...@wickedsoftware.net>
Subject Re: [Lucene.Net] Lucene.Net Hackathon (5/13-/516)
Date Wed, 11 May 2011 18:39:09 GMT
If any of you follow Hanselman on twitter, please take a second a retweet
his on the lucene.net hackathon listed below or even send a thanks.

"Wanna get involved in Open Source? Why not help with the Lucene.NET
HackAThon? http://hnsl.mn/lucenehackathon "

Cheers,
- Michael

On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 7:12 PM, Troy Howard <thoward37@gmail.com> wrote:

> Here's the wiki page:
>
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/x/Go6OAQ
>
> Thanks,
> Troy
>
>
> On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 1:59 PM, Troy Howard <thoward37@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Michael,
> >
> > That worked!
> >
> > I'm in the process of making a wiki page for the event now.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Troy
> >
> >
> > On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 1:38 PM, Michael Herndon
> > <mherndon@wickedsoftware.net> wrote:
> >>
> >> log out and log back in and verify permission changes.
> >>
> >> On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 4:22 PM, Troy Howard <thoward37@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >>
> >> > Re: "I'm not sure if there is a coding difference between the C# stuff
> and
> >> > the other directory stuff."
> >> >
> >> > There are a few minor code changes in the new branch vs the C# branch,
> but
> >> > those are things like framework target, copyright notices, etc.. I
> didn't
> >> > change code significantly, and unit tests still pass.
> >> >
> >> > Re: "we can probably branch C# to something like pre_NewStructure"
> >> >
> >> > I made a tag right before committing the directory changes for this
> exact
> >> > purpose. It's here:
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/lucene.net/tags/pre-layout-change
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > Regarding the hackathon next week, I'd like to put together a list of
> tasks
> >> > specifically for this weekend to give people some focus on where they
> can
> >> > contribute. Some of these will be major tasks with high priority (like
> >> > finishing up the 2.9.4 release) and others will be of lower priority
> like
> >> > working on the samples/wiki/website... Those will great skills in
> creating
> >> > GUI apps, but less skills with writing back-end libraries might want
> to
> >> > contribute to Luke.Net, even if it's not a high priority.
> >> >
> >> > I agree with Michael that we should tweet/blog/wiki/mailing list the
> >> > details
> >> > of the event. I would make a wiki page on the topic, but it seems I
> don't
> >> > have sufficient privileges on our Confluence wiki to do that. Can
> whoever
> >> > the admin is give me rights to add/edit wiki pages? My login is
> 'thoward'.
> >> >
> >> > Thanks,
> >> > Troy
> >> >
> >> > On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 1:15 AM, Prescott Nasser <
> geobmx540@hotmail.com
> >> > >wrote:
> >> >
> >> > >
> >> > > I think Troy has the structure ready to roll - I'm not sure if there
> is a
> >> > > coding difference between the C# stuff and the other directory
> stuff. If
> >> > > there isn't then we can probably branch C# to something like
> >> > > pre_NewStructure (someone help me with a better name), then remove
> it
> >> > from
> >> > > the trunk.
> >> > >
> >> > > Troy I believe was investigating the legal task - perhaps he can
> update
> >> > us
> >> > > if he ever got an answer
> >> > >
> >> > > If you want to jump into a smaller task take a look at
> >> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-372 (currently
> assigned
> >> > to
> >> > > me). I updated a ton of the analyers, but I believe them to be out
> of
> >> > date
> >> > > from the java 2.9.4 branch because I used the attached files from
> Pasha
> >> > > without paying attention to the age of them. So those could use a
> review.
> >> > I
> >> > > also never ported the test cases, which we definately should have.
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > > ----------------------------------------
> >> > > > Date: Mon, 9 May 2011 10:04:03 +0200
> >> > > > From: mammo@rotselleri.com
> >> > > > To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org
> >> > > > Subject: Re: [Lucene.Net] Lucene.Net Hackathon (5/13-/516)
> >> > > >
> >> > > > On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 1:12 AM, Prescott Nasser wrote:
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > +1 to getting 2.9.4 ready to roll + the changes to the directory
> >> > > structure we have
> >> > > > > going
> >> > > >
> >> > > > +1 for 2.9.4 and directory structure.
> >> > > > To make that happen, I'd like to know what needs to be done and
in
> >> > > > what way I could be of any help. There are 10 open issues for
> 2.9.4,
> >> > > > and (apart from the Luke issues mentioned below) none of them
> makes me
> >> > > > feel that I can grab it and start coding.
> >> > > >
> >> > > > > -Sharpen stuff - I haven't had time to get it really working
> (not to
> >> > > mention I don't know
> >> > > > > eclipse from a hole in the ground). I haven't heard from
Alex in
> a
> >> > > while, who I think is
> >> > > > > the most knowledgeable on the subject.
> >> > > >
> >> > > > Also most important to get closer to the java version.
> >> > > >
> >> > > > > -.NET syntax.
> >> > > > +1, the API often feels quite awkward to use.
> >> > > >
> >> > > > > That said, I think Luke is important. If we left with the
idea
> of you
> >> > > could run Luke in
> >> > > > > java just find, we could also just say use lucene/solr and
the
> api
> >> > > provided, no need
> >> > > > > for the Lucene.Net project. (I know it's a bit different).
That
> said,
> >> > I
> >> > > don't think it's top
> >> > > > > priority, but it would be nice to have a .net implimentation.
> >> > > >
> >> > > > Agree, it would be nice to have.
> >> > > >
> >> > > > > Sergey was working on a port of this in WPF - can he perhaps
> provide
> >> > an
> >> > > update on
> >> > > > > what's going on with that? I think it was located at bit
bucket
> at
> >> > one
> >> > > point, and then I
> >> > > > > lost track..
> >> > > >
> >> > > > The WPF track was abandoned due to absent WPF support in mono.
I
> >> > > > adopted code attached to LUCENET-391 by Pasha Bizhan and it is
> >> > > > continued on
> >> > > > https://github.com/mammo/LukeSharp (mirror at
> >> > > > https://bitbucket.org/mammo/lukesharp). Testing and reporting
of
> >> > > > broken or missing features would be most appreciated.
> >> > > >
> >> > > > I am not sure how to resolve the Luke legal sub-task LUCENET-397,
> is
> >> > > > it enough that Pasha has attached the code or is more paper work
> >> > > > required?
> >> > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > > > /amanuel
> >> > >
> >> >
> >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message