lucenenet-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Michael Herndon <mhern...@wickedsoftware.net>
Subject Re: [Lucene.Net] Lucene.Net Hackathon (5/13-/516)
Date Wed, 11 May 2011 18:51:47 GMT
You never know.  Personally I generally have most tech people on a list
rather directly following them.

But thanks.

On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 2:43 PM, Wyatt Barnett <wyatt.barnett@gmail.com>wrote:

> Retweeted. Though I doubt any of the ~100 people following me aren't in
> the 36 following him . . .
>
> On 5/11/11 2:39 PM, "Michael Herndon" <mherndon@wickedsoftware.net> wrote:
>
> >If any of you follow Hanselman on twitter, please take a second a retweet
> >his on the lucene.net hackathon listed below or even send a thanks.
> >
> >"Wanna get involved in Open Source? Why not help with the Lucene.NET
> >HackAThon? http://hnsl.mn/lucenehackathon "
> >
> >Cheers,
> >- Michael
> >
> >On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 7:12 PM, Troy Howard <thoward37@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> Here's the wiki page:
> >>
> >> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/x/Go6OAQ
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> Troy
> >>
> >>
> >> On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 1:59 PM, Troy Howard <thoward37@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >> > Michael,
> >> >
> >> > That worked!
> >> >
> >> > I'm in the process of making a wiki page for the event now.
> >> >
> >> > Thanks,
> >> > Troy
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 1:38 PM, Michael Herndon
> >> > <mherndon@wickedsoftware.net> wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> log out and log back in and verify permission changes.
> >> >>
> >> >> On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 4:22 PM, Troy Howard <thoward37@gmail.com>
> >> wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> > Re: "I'm not sure if there is a coding difference between the
C#
> >>stuff
> >> and
> >> >> > the other directory stuff."
> >> >> >
> >> >> > There are a few minor code changes in the new branch vs the C#
> >>branch,
> >> but
> >> >> > those are things like framework target, copyright notices, etc..
I
> >> didn't
> >> >> > change code significantly, and unit tests still pass.
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Re: "we can probably branch C# to something like pre_NewStructure"
> >> >> >
> >> >> > I made a tag right before committing the directory changes for
this
> >> exact
> >> >> > purpose. It's here:
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >>
> >>
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/lucene.net/tags/pre-layout-cha
> >>nge
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Regarding the hackathon next week, I'd like to put together a
list
> >>of
> >> tasks
> >> >> > specifically for this weekend to give people some focus on where
> >>they
> >> can
> >> >> > contribute. Some of these will be major tasks with high priority
> >>(like
> >> >> > finishing up the 2.9.4 release) and others will be of lower
> >>priority
> >> like
> >> >> > working on the samples/wiki/website... Those will great skills
in
> >> creating
> >> >> > GUI apps, but less skills with writing back-end libraries might
> >>want
> >> to
> >> >> > contribute to Luke.Net, even if it's not a high priority.
> >> >> >
> >> >> > I agree with Michael that we should tweet/blog/wiki/mailing list
> >>the
> >> >> > details
> >> >> > of the event. I would make a wiki page on the topic, but it seems
I
> >> don't
> >> >> > have sufficient privileges on our Confluence wiki to do that.
Can
> >> whoever
> >> >> > the admin is give me rights to add/edit wiki pages? My login is
> >> 'thoward'.
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Thanks,
> >> >> > Troy
> >> >> >
> >> >> > On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 1:15 AM, Prescott Nasser <
> >> geobmx540@hotmail.com
> >> >> > >wrote:
> >> >> >
> >> >> > >
> >> >> > > I think Troy has the structure ready to roll - I'm not sure
if
> >>there
> >> is a
> >> >> > > coding difference between the C# stuff and the other directory
> >> stuff. If
> >> >> > > there isn't then we can probably branch C# to something like
> >> >> > > pre_NewStructure (someone help me with a better name), then
> >>remove
> >> it
> >> >> > from
> >> >> > > the trunk.
> >> >> > >
> >> >> > > Troy I believe was investigating the legal task - perhaps
he can
> >> update
> >> >> > us
> >> >> > > if he ever got an answer
> >> >> > >
> >> >> > > If you want to jump into a smaller task take a look at
> >> >> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-372 (currently
> >> assigned
> >> >> > to
> >> >> > > me). I updated a ton of the analyers, but I believe them
to be
> >>out
> >> of
> >> >> > date
> >> >> > > from the java 2.9.4 branch because I used the attached files
from
> >> Pasha
> >> >> > > without paying attention to the age of them. So those could
use a
> >> review.
> >> >> > I
> >> >> > > also never ported the test cases, which we definately should
> >>have.
> >> >> > >
> >> >> > >
> >> >> > >
> >> >> > > ----------------------------------------
> >> >> > > > Date: Mon, 9 May 2011 10:04:03 +0200
> >> >> > > > From: mammo@rotselleri.com
> >> >> > > > To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org
> >> >> > > > Subject: Re: [Lucene.Net] Lucene.Net Hackathon (5/13-/516)
> >> >> > > >
> >> >> > > > On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 1:12 AM, Prescott Nasser wrote:
> >> >> > > > >
> >> >> > > > > +1 to getting 2.9.4 ready to roll + the changes
to the
> >>directory
> >> >> > > structure we have
> >> >> > > > > going
> >> >> > > >
> >> >> > > > +1 for 2.9.4 and directory structure.
> >> >> > > > To make that happen, I'd like to know what needs to
be done
> >>and in
> >> >> > > > what way I could be of any help. There are 10 open issues
for
> >> 2.9.4,
> >> >> > > > and (apart from the Luke issues mentioned below) none
of them
> >> makes me
> >> >> > > > feel that I can grab it and start coding.
> >> >> > > >
> >> >> > > > > -Sharpen stuff - I haven't had time to get it really
working
> >> (not to
> >> >> > > mention I don't know
> >> >> > > > > eclipse from a hole in the ground). I haven't heard
from
> >>Alex in
> >> a
> >> >> > > while, who I think is
> >> >> > > > > the most knowledgeable on the subject.
> >> >> > > >
> >> >> > > > Also most important to get closer to the java version.
> >> >> > > >
> >> >> > > > > -.NET syntax.
> >> >> > > > +1, the API often feels quite awkward to use.
> >> >> > > >
> >> >> > > > > That said, I think Luke is important. If we left
with the
> >>idea
> >> of you
> >> >> > > could run Luke in
> >> >> > > > > java just find, we could also just say use lucene/solr
and
> >>the
> >> api
> >> >> > > provided, no need
> >> >> > > > > for the Lucene.Net project. (I know it's a bit
different).
> >>That
> >> said,
> >> >> > I
> >> >> > > don't think it's top
> >> >> > > > > priority, but it would be nice to have a .net implimentation.
> >> >> > > >
> >> >> > > > Agree, it would be nice to have.
> >> >> > > >
> >> >> > > > > Sergey was working on a port of this in WPF - can
he perhaps
> >> provide
> >> >> > an
> >> >> > > update on
> >> >> > > > > what's going on with that? I think it was located
at bit
> >>bucket
> >> at
> >> >> > one
> >> >> > > point, and then I
> >> >> > > > > lost track..
> >> >> > > >
> >> >> > > > The WPF track was abandoned due to absent WPF support
in mono.
> >>I
> >> >> > > > adopted code attached to LUCENET-391 by Pasha Bizhan
and it is
> >> >> > > > continued on
> >> >> > > > https://github.com/mammo/LukeSharp (mirror at
> >> >> > > > https://bitbucket.org/mammo/lukesharp). Testing and
reporting
> >>of
> >> >> > > > broken or missing features would be most appreciated.
> >> >> > > >
> >> >> > > > I am not sure how to resolve the Luke legal sub-task
> >>LUCENET-397,
> >> is
> >> >> > > > it enough that Pasha has attached the code or is more
paper
> >>work
> >> >> > > > required?
> >> >> > > >
> >> >> > > >
> >> >> > > > /amanuel
> >> >> > >
> >> >> >
> >> >
> >>
>
>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message