lucenenet-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Michael Neel <michael.n...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [Lucene.Net] VOTE: .NET 2.0 Framework Support After Apache Lucene.Net 2.9.4
Date Wed, 11 May 2011 21:34:10 GMT
+1

On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 12:43 PM, Alon Shwartz <AlonS@docstoc.com> wrote:

> [+1]. It's way over due and time to move on to new technologies. I would
> move to .Net 4.0 as by the time the Lucene.Net would be ready and
> (somewhat) stable so will .Net 4.0
>
>
> Alon Shwartz
> CTO & co-founder
> docstoc.com
> alons@docstoc.com
> o:  (310) 255-1172
> m: (818) 231-8191
> f:  (310) 255-1176
> a:  409 Santa Monica Blvd, suite 2A
>     Santa Monica, CA 90401
>
> blog: alonshwartz.com
> twitter: twitter.com/alonsh
>
>
>
>
> On 5/9/11 1:04 PM, "Troy Howard" <thoward37@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >All,
> >
> >Please cast your votes regarding the topic of .Net Framework support.
> >
> >The question on the table is:
> >
> >Should Apache Lucene.Net 2.9.4 be the last release which supports the
> >.Net 2.0 Framework?
> >
> >Some options are:
> >
> >[+1] - Yes, move forward to the latest .Net Framework version, and drop
> >support for 2.0 completely. New features and performance are more
> >important
> >than backwards compatibility.
> >[0] - Yes, focus on the latest .Net Framework, but also include patches
> >and/or preprocessor directives and conditional compilation blocks to
> >include
> >support for 2.0 when needed. New features, performance, and backwards
> >compatibility are all equally important and it's worth the additional
> >complexity and coding work to meet all of those goals.
> >[-1] No, .Net Framework 2.0 should remain our target platform. Backwards
> >compatibility is more important than new features and performance.
> >
> >
> >This vote is not limited to the Apache Lucene.Net IPMC. All
> >users/contributors/committers/mailing list lurkers are welcome to cast
> >their
> >votes with an equal weight. This has been cross posted to both the dev and
> >user mailing lists.
> >
> >Thanks,
> >Troy
>
>


-- 
Michael C. Neel (@ViNull)
http://www.ViNull.com

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message