lucenenet-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Troy Howard <thowar...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [Lucene.Net] Lucene.Net Hackathon (5/13-/516)
Date Mon, 09 May 2011 20:59:26 GMT
Michael,

That worked!

I'm in the process of making a wiki page for the event now.

Thanks,
Troy


On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 1:38 PM, Michael Herndon
<mherndon@wickedsoftware.net> wrote:
>
> log out and log back in and verify permission changes.
>
> On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 4:22 PM, Troy Howard <thoward37@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Re: "I'm not sure if there is a coding difference between the C# stuff and
> > the other directory stuff."
> >
> > There are a few minor code changes in the new branch vs the C# branch, but
> > those are things like framework target, copyright notices, etc.. I didn't
> > change code significantly, and unit tests still pass.
> >
> > Re: "we can probably branch C# to something like pre_NewStructure"
> >
> > I made a tag right before committing the directory changes for this exact
> > purpose. It's here:
> >
> >
> > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/lucene.net/tags/pre-layout-change
> >
> >
> > Regarding the hackathon next week, I'd like to put together a list of tasks
> > specifically for this weekend to give people some focus on where they can
> > contribute. Some of these will be major tasks with high priority (like
> > finishing up the 2.9.4 release) and others will be of lower priority like
> > working on the samples/wiki/website... Those will great skills in creating
> > GUI apps, but less skills with writing back-end libraries might want to
> > contribute to Luke.Net, even if it's not a high priority.
> >
> > I agree with Michael that we should tweet/blog/wiki/mailing list the
> > details
> > of the event. I would make a wiki page on the topic, but it seems I don't
> > have sufficient privileges on our Confluence wiki to do that. Can whoever
> > the admin is give me rights to add/edit wiki pages? My login is 'thoward'.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Troy
> >
> > On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 1:15 AM, Prescott Nasser <geobmx540@hotmail.com
> > >wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > I think Troy has the structure ready to roll - I'm not sure if there is a
> > > coding difference between the C# stuff and the other directory stuff. If
> > > there isn't then we can probably branch C# to something like
> > > pre_NewStructure (someone help me with a better name), then remove it
> > from
> > > the trunk.
> > >
> > > Troy I believe was investigating the legal task - perhaps he can update
> > us
> > > if he ever got an answer
> > >
> > > If you want to jump into a smaller task take a look at
> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-372 (currently assigned
> > to
> > > me). I updated a ton of the analyers, but I believe them to be out of
> > date
> > > from the java 2.9.4 branch because I used the attached files from Pasha
> > > without paying attention to the age of them. So those could use a review.
> > I
> > > also never ported the test cases, which we definately should have.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > ----------------------------------------
> > > > Date: Mon, 9 May 2011 10:04:03 +0200
> > > > From: mammo@rotselleri.com
> > > > To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org
> > > > Subject: Re: [Lucene.Net] Lucene.Net Hackathon (5/13-/516)
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 1:12 AM, Prescott Nasser wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > +1 to getting 2.9.4 ready to roll + the changes to the directory
> > > structure we have
> > > > > going
> > > >
> > > > +1 for 2.9.4 and directory structure.
> > > > To make that happen, I'd like to know what needs to be done and in
> > > > what way I could be of any help. There are 10 open issues for 2.9.4,
> > > > and (apart from the Luke issues mentioned below) none of them makes me
> > > > feel that I can grab it and start coding.
> > > >
> > > > > -Sharpen stuff - I haven't had time to get it really working (not
to
> > > mention I don't know
> > > > > eclipse from a hole in the ground). I haven't heard from Alex in
a
> > > while, who I think is
> > > > > the most knowledgeable on the subject.
> > > >
> > > > Also most important to get closer to the java version.
> > > >
> > > > > -.NET syntax.
> > > > +1, the API often feels quite awkward to use.
> > > >
> > > > > That said, I think Luke is important. If we left with the idea of
you
> > > could run Luke in
> > > > > java just find, we could also just say use lucene/solr and the api
> > > provided, no need
> > > > > for the Lucene.Net project. (I know it's a bit different). That said,
> > I
> > > don't think it's top
> > > > > priority, but it would be nice to have a .net implimentation.
> > > >
> > > > Agree, it would be nice to have.
> > > >
> > > > > Sergey was working on a port of this in WPF - can he perhaps provide
> > an
> > > update on
> > > > > what's going on with that? I think it was located at bit bucket at
> > one
> > > point, and then I
> > > > > lost track..
> > > >
> > > > The WPF track was abandoned due to absent WPF support in mono. I
> > > > adopted code attached to LUCENET-391 by Pasha Bizhan and it is
> > > > continued on
> > > > https://github.com/mammo/LukeSharp (mirror at
> > > > https://bitbucket.org/mammo/lukesharp). Testing and reporting of
> > > > broken or missing features would be most appreciated.
> > > >
> > > > I am not sure how to resolve the Luke legal sub-task LUCENET-397, is
> > > > it enough that Pasha has attached the code or is more paper work
> > > > required?
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > /amanuel
> > >
> >

Mime
View raw message