lucenenet-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Michael Herndon <mhern...@wickedsoftware.net>
Subject Re: [Lucene.Net] Lucene.Net Hackathon (5/13-/516)
Date Mon, 09 May 2011 20:38:17 GMT
log out and log back in and verify permission changes.

On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 4:22 PM, Troy Howard <thoward37@gmail.com> wrote:

> Re: "I'm not sure if there is a coding difference between the C# stuff and
> the other directory stuff."
>
> There are a few minor code changes in the new branch vs the C# branch, but
> those are things like framework target, copyright notices, etc.. I didn't
> change code significantly, and unit tests still pass.
>
> Re: "we can probably branch C# to something like pre_NewStructure"
>
> I made a tag right before committing the directory changes for this exact
> purpose. It's here:
>
>
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/lucene.net/tags/pre-layout-change
>
>
> Regarding the hackathon next week, I'd like to put together a list of tasks
> specifically for this weekend to give people some focus on where they can
> contribute. Some of these will be major tasks with high priority (like
> finishing up the 2.9.4 release) and others will be of lower priority like
> working on the samples/wiki/website... Those will great skills in creating
> GUI apps, but less skills with writing back-end libraries might want to
> contribute to Luke.Net, even if it's not a high priority.
>
> I agree with Michael that we should tweet/blog/wiki/mailing list the
> details
> of the event. I would make a wiki page on the topic, but it seems I don't
> have sufficient privileges on our Confluence wiki to do that. Can whoever
> the admin is give me rights to add/edit wiki pages? My login is 'thoward'.
>
> Thanks,
> Troy
>
> On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 1:15 AM, Prescott Nasser <geobmx540@hotmail.com
> >wrote:
>
> >
> > I think Troy has the structure ready to roll - I'm not sure if there is a
> > coding difference between the C# stuff and the other directory stuff. If
> > there isn't then we can probably branch C# to something like
> > pre_NewStructure (someone help me with a better name), then remove it
> from
> > the trunk.
> >
> > Troy I believe was investigating the legal task - perhaps he can update
> us
> > if he ever got an answer
> >
> > If you want to jump into a smaller task take a look at
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-372 (currently assigned
> to
> > me). I updated a ton of the analyers, but I believe them to be out of
> date
> > from the java 2.9.4 branch because I used the attached files from Pasha
> > without paying attention to the age of them. So those could use a review.
> I
> > also never ported the test cases, which we definately should have.
> >
> >
> >
> > ----------------------------------------
> > > Date: Mon, 9 May 2011 10:04:03 +0200
> > > From: mammo@rotselleri.com
> > > To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org
> > > Subject: Re: [Lucene.Net] Lucene.Net Hackathon (5/13-/516)
> > >
> > > On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 1:12 AM, Prescott Nasser wrote:
> > > >
> > > > +1 to getting 2.9.4 ready to roll + the changes to the directory
> > structure we have
> > > > going
> > >
> > > +1 for 2.9.4 and directory structure.
> > > To make that happen, I'd like to know what needs to be done and in
> > > what way I could be of any help. There are 10 open issues for 2.9.4,
> > > and (apart from the Luke issues mentioned below) none of them makes me
> > > feel that I can grab it and start coding.
> > >
> > > > -Sharpen stuff - I haven't had time to get it really working (not to
> > mention I don't know
> > > > eclipse from a hole in the ground). I haven't heard from Alex in a
> > while, who I think is
> > > > the most knowledgeable on the subject.
> > >
> > > Also most important to get closer to the java version.
> > >
> > > > -.NET syntax.
> > > +1, the API often feels quite awkward to use.
> > >
> > > > That said, I think Luke is important. If we left with the idea of you
> > could run Luke in
> > > > java just find, we could also just say use lucene/solr and the api
> > provided, no need
> > > > for the Lucene.Net project. (I know it's a bit different). That said,
> I
> > don't think it's top
> > > > priority, but it would be nice to have a .net implimentation.
> > >
> > > Agree, it would be nice to have.
> > >
> > > > Sergey was working on a port of this in WPF - can he perhaps provide
> an
> > update on
> > > > what's going on with that? I think it was located at bit bucket at
> one
> > point, and then I
> > > > lost track..
> > >
> > > The WPF track was abandoned due to absent WPF support in mono. I
> > > adopted code attached to LUCENET-391 by Pasha Bizhan and it is
> > > continued on
> > > https://github.com/mammo/LukeSharp (mirror at
> > > https://bitbucket.org/mammo/lukesharp). Testing and reporting of
> > > broken or missing features would be most appreciated.
> > >
> > > I am not sure how to resolve the Luke legal sub-task LUCENET-397, is
> > > it enough that Pasha has attached the code or is more paper work
> > > required?
> > >
> > >
> > > /amanuel
> >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message