lucenenet-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Troy Howard <thowar...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [Lucene.Net] Lucene.Net Hackathon (5/13-/516)
Date Wed, 11 May 2011 20:38:47 GMT
No problem. I set up the permissions such that any user account can
edit/add pages in the wiki.

This should make things a lot easier on us.

Thanks,
Troy


On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 12:50 PM, Michael Herndon
<mherndon@wickedsoftware.net> wrote:
> Troy,
>
> Confluence admin is not my forte, but I can look at the privileges tonight
> and see if we change that.
>
> You and Prescott also have admin privileges as of right now. I'm pretty much
> giving all committers who have forwarded their username those privileges.
>
> I've also added a snippet to the page for people to e-mail me in the
> meantime if they are unable to edit the page to add to the table on the
> hack-a-thon page.  (And there are some who may just not want to join yet
> another wiki).
>
> Do keep an eye out for spam once we elevate privileges.
>
> - Michael
>
> On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 3:37 PM, Troy Howard <thoward37@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Thanks Michael!
>>
>> One quick question -- the Wiki seems to be really locked down for
>> public editing. That's kind of strange. Anyone should be able to log
>> in and whip up a new page or edit an existing one, committer or
>> otherwise. I didn't have access until just the other day, and Chris
>> Currens doesn't have access now (I had to add him to the page
>> manually).
>>
>> Can we open up the permissions on our wiki?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Troy
>>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 11:51 AM, Michael Herndon
>> <mherndon@wickedsoftware.net> wrote:
>> > You never know.  Personally I generally have most tech people on a list
>> > rather directly following them.
>> >
>> > But thanks.
>> >
>> > On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 2:43 PM, Wyatt Barnett <wyatt.barnett@gmail.com
>> >wrote:
>> >
>> >> Retweeted. Though I doubt any of the ~100 people following me aren't in
>> >> the 36 following him . . .
>> >>
>> >> On 5/11/11 2:39 PM, "Michael Herndon" <mherndon@wickedsoftware.net>
>> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> >If any of you follow Hanselman on twitter, please take a second a
>> retweet
>> >> >his on the lucene.net hackathon listed below or even send a thanks.
>> >> >
>> >> >"Wanna get involved in Open Source? Why not help with the Lucene.NET
>> >> >HackAThon? http://hnsl.mn/lucenehackathon "
>> >> >
>> >> >Cheers,
>> >> >- Michael
>> >> >
>> >> >On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 7:12 PM, Troy Howard <thoward37@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> >> Here's the wiki page:
>> >> >>
>> >> >> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/x/Go6OAQ
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Thanks,
>> >> >> Troy
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 1:59 PM, Troy Howard <thoward37@gmail.com>
>> >> wrote:
>> >> >> > Michael,
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > That worked!
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > I'm in the process of making a wiki page for the event now.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > Thanks,
>> >> >> > Troy
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 1:38 PM, Michael Herndon
>> >> >> > <mherndon@wickedsoftware.net> wrote:
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> log out and log back in and verify permission changes.
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 4:22 PM, Troy Howard <thoward37@gmail.com>
>> >> >> wrote:
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> > Re: "I'm not sure if there is a coding difference
between the C#
>> >> >>stuff
>> >> >> and
>> >> >> >> > the other directory stuff."
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> > There are a few minor code changes in the new branch
vs the C#
>> >> >>branch,
>> >> >> but
>> >> >> >> > those are things like framework target, copyright
notices, etc..
>> I
>> >> >> didn't
>> >> >> >> > change code significantly, and unit tests still pass.
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> > Re: "we can probably branch C# to something like
>> pre_NewStructure"
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> > I made a tag right before committing the directory
changes for
>> this
>> >> >> exact
>> >> >> >> > purpose. It's here:
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >>
>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/lucene.net/tags/pre-layout-cha
>> >> >>nge
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> > Regarding the hackathon next week, I'd like to put
together a
>> list
>> >> >>of
>> >> >> tasks
>> >> >> >> > specifically for this weekend to give people some
focus on where
>> >> >>they
>> >> >> can
>> >> >> >> > contribute. Some of these will be major tasks with
high priority
>> >> >>(like
>> >> >> >> > finishing up the 2.9.4 release) and others will be
of lower
>> >> >>priority
>> >> >> like
>> >> >> >> > working on the samples/wiki/website... Those will
great skills
>> in
>> >> >> creating
>> >> >> >> > GUI apps, but less skills with writing back-end libraries
might
>> >> >>want
>> >> >> to
>> >> >> >> > contribute to Luke.Net, even if it's not a high priority.
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> > I agree with Michael that we should tweet/blog/wiki/mailing
list
>> >> >>the
>> >> >> >> > details
>> >> >> >> > of the event. I would make a wiki page on the topic,
but it
>> seems I
>> >> >> don't
>> >> >> >> > have sufficient privileges on our Confluence wiki
to do that.
>> Can
>> >> >> whoever
>> >> >> >> > the admin is give me rights to add/edit wiki pages?
My login is
>> >> >> 'thoward'.
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> > Thanks,
>> >> >> >> > Troy
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> > On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 1:15 AM, Prescott Nasser <
>> >> >> geobmx540@hotmail.com
>> >> >> >> > >wrote:
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> > >
>> >> >> >> > > I think Troy has the structure ready to roll
- I'm not sure if
>> >> >>there
>> >> >> is a
>> >> >> >> > > coding difference between the C# stuff and the
other directory
>> >> >> stuff. If
>> >> >> >> > > there isn't then we can probably branch C# to
something like
>> >> >> >> > > pre_NewStructure (someone help me with a better
name), then
>> >> >>remove
>> >> >> it
>> >> >> >> > from
>> >> >> >> > > the trunk.
>> >> >> >> > >
>> >> >> >> > > Troy I believe was investigating the legal task
- perhaps he
>> can
>> >> >> update
>> >> >> >> > us
>> >> >> >> > > if he ever got an answer
>> >> >> >> > >
>> >> >> >> > > If you want to jump into a smaller task take
a look at
>> >> >> >> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-372(currently
>> >> >> assigned
>> >> >> >> > to
>> >> >> >> > > me). I updated a ton of the analyers, but I
believe them to be
>> >> >>out
>> >> >> of
>> >> >> >> > date
>> >> >> >> > > from the java 2.9.4 branch because I used the
attached files
>> from
>> >> >> Pasha
>> >> >> >> > > without paying attention to the age of them.
So those could
>> use a
>> >> >> review.
>> >> >> >> > I
>> >> >> >> > > also never ported the test cases, which we definately
should
>> >> >>have.
>> >> >> >> > >
>> >> >> >> > >
>> >> >> >> > >
>> >> >> >> > > ----------------------------------------
>> >> >> >> > > > Date: Mon, 9 May 2011 10:04:03 +0200
>> >> >> >> > > > From: mammo@rotselleri.com
>> >> >> >> > > > To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org
>> >> >> >> > > > Subject: Re: [Lucene.Net] Lucene.Net Hackathon
(5/13-/516)
>> >> >> >> > > >
>> >> >> >> > > > On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 1:12 AM, Prescott
Nasser wrote:
>> >> >> >> > > > >
>> >> >> >> > > > > +1 to getting 2.9.4 ready to roll
+ the changes to the
>> >> >>directory
>> >> >> >> > > structure we have
>> >> >> >> > > > > going
>> >> >> >> > > >
>> >> >> >> > > > +1 for 2.9.4 and directory structure.
>> >> >> >> > > > To make that happen, I'd like to know what
needs to be done
>> >> >>and in
>> >> >> >> > > > what way I could be of any help. There
are 10 open issues
>> for
>> >> >> 2.9.4,
>> >> >> >> > > > and (apart from the Luke issues mentioned
below) none of
>> them
>> >> >> makes me
>> >> >> >> > > > feel that I can grab it and start coding.
>> >> >> >> > > >
>> >> >> >> > > > > -Sharpen stuff - I haven't had time
to get it really
>> working
>> >> >> (not to
>> >> >> >> > > mention I don't know
>> >> >> >> > > > > eclipse from a hole in the ground).
I haven't heard from
>> >> >>Alex in
>> >> >> a
>> >> >> >> > > while, who I think is
>> >> >> >> > > > > the most knowledgeable on the subject.
>> >> >> >> > > >
>> >> >> >> > > > Also most important to get closer to the
java version.
>> >> >> >> > > >
>> >> >> >> > > > > -.NET syntax.
>> >> >> >> > > > +1, the API often feels quite awkward to
use.
>> >> >> >> > > >
>> >> >> >> > > > > That said, I think Luke is important.
If we left with the
>> >> >>idea
>> >> >> of you
>> >> >> >> > > could run Luke in
>> >> >> >> > > > > java just find, we could also just
say use lucene/solr and
>> >> >>the
>> >> >> api
>> >> >> >> > > provided, no need
>> >> >> >> > > > > for the Lucene.Net project. (I know
it's a bit different).
>> >> >>That
>> >> >> said,
>> >> >> >> > I
>> >> >> >> > > don't think it's top
>> >> >> >> > > > > priority, but it would be nice to
have a .net
>> implimentation.
>> >> >> >> > > >
>> >> >> >> > > > Agree, it would be nice to have.
>> >> >> >> > > >
>> >> >> >> > > > > Sergey was working on a port of this
in WPF - can he
>> perhaps
>> >> >> provide
>> >> >> >> > an
>> >> >> >> > > update on
>> >> >> >> > > > > what's going on with that? I think
it was located at bit
>> >> >>bucket
>> >> >> at
>> >> >> >> > one
>> >> >> >> > > point, and then I
>> >> >> >> > > > > lost track..
>> >> >> >> > > >
>> >> >> >> > > > The WPF track was abandoned due to absent
WPF support in
>> mono.
>> >> >>I
>> >> >> >> > > > adopted code attached to LUCENET-391 by
Pasha Bizhan and it
>> is
>> >> >> >> > > > continued on
>> >> >> >> > > > https://github.com/mammo/LukeSharp (mirror
at
>> >> >> >> > > > https://bitbucket.org/mammo/lukesharp).
Testing and
>> reporting
>> >> >>of
>> >> >> >> > > > broken or missing features would be most
appreciated.
>> >> >> >> > > >
>> >> >> >> > > > I am not sure how to resolve the Luke legal
sub-task
>> >> >>LUCENET-397,
>> >> >> is
>> >> >> >> > > > it enough that Pasha has attached the code
or is more paper
>> >> >>work
>> >> >> >> > > > required?
>> >> >> >> > > >
>> >> >> >> > > >
>> >> >> >> > > > /amanuel
>> >> >> >> > >
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >
>> >> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >
>>
>

Mime
View raw message