lucenenet-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Vincent DARON <vda...@ask.be>
Subject Re: [Lucene.Net] VOTE: .NET 2.0 Framework Support After Apache Lucene.Net 2.9.4
Date Wed, 11 May 2011 08:07:00 GMT
Do it, if you need it. +1



Le 10/05/11 20:02, Lombard, Scott a écrit :
> +1
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Troy Howard [mailto:thoward37@gmail.com]
>> Sent: Monday, May 09, 2011 4:05 PM
>> To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org; lucene-net-user@lucene.apache.org
>> Subject: [Lucene.Net] VOTE: .NET 2.0 Framework Support After Apache
>> Lucene.Net 2.9.4
>>
>> All,
>>
>> Please cast your votes regarding the topic of .Net Framework support.
>>
>> The question on the table is:
>>
>> Should Apache Lucene.Net 2.9.4 be the last release which supports the
>> .Net 2.0 Framework?
>>
>> Some options are:
>>
>> [+1] - Yes, move forward to the latest .Net Framework version, and drop
>> support for 2.0 completely. New features and performance are more
>> important
>> than backwards compatibility.
>> [0] - Yes, focus on the latest .Net Framework, but also include patches
>> and/or preprocessor directives and conditional compilation blocks to
>> include
>> support for 2.0 when needed. New features, performance, and backwards
>> compatibility are all equally important and it's worth the additional
>> complexity and coding work to meet all of those goals.
>> [-1] No, .Net Framework 2.0 should remain our target platform. Backwards
>> compatibility is more important than new features and performance.
>>
>>
>> This vote is not limited to the Apache Lucene.Net IPMC. All
>> users/contributors/committers/mailing list lurkers are welcome to cast
>> their
>> votes with an equal weight. This has been cross posted to both the dev and
>> user mailing lists.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Troy
>
> This message (and any associated files) is intended only for the
> use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed and may
> contain information that is confidential, subject to copyright or
> constitutes a trade secret. If you are not the intended recipient
> you are hereby notified that any dissemination, copying or
> distribution of this message, or files associated with this message,
> is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error,
> please notify us immediately by replying to the message and deleting
> it from your computer.  Thank you, King Industries, Inc.
>

Mime
View raw message