lucenenet-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Scott Lombard" <lombardena...@gmail.com>
Subject RE: [Lucene.Net] Lucene.Net Hackathon (5/13-/516)
Date Mon, 09 May 2011 14:45:28 GMT

I sent an email out and never heard back from them.  We are back to forking
outside of the Lucene.Net repos if need to.  

Scott



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Alex Thompson [mailto:pierogitus@hotmail.com]
> Sent: Sunday, May 08, 2011 10:08 PM
> To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: RE: [Lucene.Net] Lucene.Net Hackathon (5/13-/516)
> 
> On sharpen, I was waiting to hear back on the legal stuff of forking and
> fell off the grid for a while. Did we ever figure things out with that?
> Alex
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Prescott Nasser [mailto:geobmx540@hotmail.com]
> Sent: Sunday, May 08, 2011 4:12 PM
> To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: RE: [Lucene.Net] Lucene.Net Hackathon (5/13-/516)
> 
> 
> +1 to getting 2.9.4 ready to roll + the changes to the directory
> +structure we have going
> 
> Two and three on my list are :
> 
> -Sharpen stuff - I haven't had time to get it really working (not to
> mention
> I don't know eclipse from a hole in the ground). I haven't heard from Alex
> in a while, who I think is the most knowledgeable on the subject.
> 
> -.NET syntax.
> 
> -----
> 
> That said, I think Luke is important. If we left with the idea of you
> could
> run Luke in java just find, we could also just say use lucene/solr and the
> api provided, no need for the Lucene.Net project. (I know it's a bit
> different). That said, I don't think it's top priority, but it would be
> nice
> to have a .net implimentation.
> 
> Sergey was working on a port of this in WPF - can he perhaps provide an
> update on what's going on with that? I think it was located at bit bucket
> at
> one point, and then I lost track..
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ----------------------------------------
> > Date: Sun, 8 May 2011 23:51:08 +0300
> > From: itamar@code972.com
> > To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org
> > CC: thoward37@gmail.com
> > Subject: Re: [Lucene.Net] Lucene.Net Hackathon (5/13-/516)
> >
> > Making release 2.9.4 and performance tuning are the hottest items IMHO.
> >
> >
> > If you ask me, there's no need for Luke.NET. Luke is just a tool, and
> > we can run it just fine in Java. Same goes for docs - the Java version
> > has this covered.
> >
> >
> > Itamar.
> >
> >
> > On 08/05/2011 23:29, Troy Howard wrote:
> >
> > > All,
> > >
> > > I'll be attending the Apache Retreat in Knockree next week
> > > (5/13-5/16). I was thinking it would be fun to arrange a Lucene.Net
> > > Hackathon for the same time frame. Even if you can't go to the
> > > event, we can hack together in a distributed fashion. ;)
> > >
> > > Hackathons are usually focused on particular features/tasks. Some
> > > outstanding tasks are:
> > >
> > > - Release 2.9.4
> > > - Work on Sharpen/fully automated port (initial implementation)
> > > - Luke.Net
> > > - .Net idiomatic API (initial design)
> > > - Improve website documentation, how tos, samples, etc
> > > - Miscellaneous alternative framework support (Compact, Silverlight)
> > > - ???
> > >
> > > Does this sound like a fun idea? Got any other tasks we could try to
> > > tackle that didn't occur to me as I typed up this email?
> > >
> > > Even if no one else wants to get in on the Hackathon, I'll be
> > > working on Lucene.Net all weekend, so which ones of these do you
> > > think is most urgent/interesting?
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Troy
> > >



Mime
View raw message