lucenenet-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Troy Howard (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [Lucene.Net] [jira] [Commented] (LUCENENET-417) implement streams as field values
Date Thu, 26 May 2011 00:18:47 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-417?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13039443#comment-13039443
] 

Troy Howard commented on LUCENENET-417:
---------------------------------------

Chris's goal here is to prevent large blobs from being placed in memory either as binary data
or as string data. This is to prevent OOM exceptions on very large documents. Using Stream
semantics, you can avoid this. 

The limitation of TextReader value types not being stored is due to the TextReader type being
forward-only, which is based around how Encodings work, not due to some kind of fundamental
mismatch with Lucene's business rules. There is no reason you should not be provide a resettable
Stream, and an Encoding and perform the same operations, but reset the stream between tokenization
and value storage stages. 

The only issue would be multi-threading, if tokenization and value storage were happening
at the same time, they could not operate against the same stream.

> implement streams as field values
> ---------------------------------
>
>                 Key: LUCENENET-417
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-417
>             Project: Lucene.Net
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>          Components: Lucene.Net Core
>            Reporter: Christopher Currens
>         Attachments: BinaryStream.patch
>
>
> Adding binary values to a field is an expensive operation, as the whole binary data must
be loaded into memory and then written to the index.  Adding the ability to use a stream instead
of a byte array could not only speed up the indexing process, but reducing the memory footprint
as well.
> -Java lucene has the ability to use a TextReader the both analyze and store text in the
index.-  Lucene.NET lacks the ability to store string data in the index via streams. This
should be a feature added into Lucene .NET as well.  My thoughts are to add another Field
constructor, that is Field(string name, System.IO.Stream stream, System.Text.Encoding encoding),
that will allow the text to be analyzed and stored into the index.
> Comments about this approach are greatly appreciated.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

Mime
View raw message