lucenenet-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Prescott Nasser <geobmx...@hotmail.com>
Subject RE: [Lucene.Net] [VOTE] New Directory Layout for Project
Date Wed, 09 Mar 2011 19:08:07 GMT

Probably just a miss - but under the src/contrib folder you also have a number of tests in
there...
 
 
Also, is it necessary to have all the sub folders? For the most part the stuff in contrib.net
is contrib.net - why the secondary folder? Unless that is a requirement of NUnit to have the
structure that way it seems a bit cluttered.
 
I would think something like
 
src/contrib/contrib.net/
src/contrib/Snowball.net/
 
instead of 
 
src/contrib/contrib.net/contrib.net/
src/contrib/snowball/snowball.net/

I don't know how people feel about that


~P


----------------------------------------
> Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2011 13:31:34 -0500
> From: mherndon@wickedsoftware.net
> To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org
> CC: thoward37@gmail.com
> Subject: Re: [Lucene.Net] [VOTE] New Directory Layout for Project
>
> +1
>
> just a question though. for cmd/bat//sh files for letting people executing
> the build or just executing other tools from the command line, would those
> have a place in /bin or somewhere els? This is that someone can just export
> PATH = / SET PATH= to that one folder and then be able to execute those
> commands from one location?
>
>
>
> On Sun, Mar 6, 2011 at 11:27 PM, Troy Howard wrote:
>
> > All,
> >
> > We'd like to update the project directory structure/layout.
> >
> > See below for a proposed layout. I've also uploaded an example which
> > you can navigate at:
> >
> > http://people.apache.org/~thoward/Lucene.Net/directory-structure-example
> >
> > NOTE: This will not build!! I just put things in the appropriate
> > places without updating the solution/project files to show how we
> > might lay things out. Also, I included NUnit as an example of a
> > third-party dependency that we might include in the repository under
> > 'lib'. We of course will *not* be distributing NUnit in this manner,
> > due to licensing restrictions.
> >
> > Ok, disclaimer over...
> >
> > Please vote on this layout, or suggest a modification or alternative
> > layout.
> >
> > Voting will be open for 72 hours.
> >
> > [ ] +1 Use this directory structure exactly as described, or with a
> > minor modification
> > [ ] 0 Use a different structure (described in response)
> > [ ] -1 Do not change the directory structure at all
> >
> >
> > Text description of directory schema:
> >
> > Build Files:
> >
> > \build
> > \build\VS2008
> > \build\VS2010
> >
> >
> > Source Projects:
> >
> > \src
> > \src\contrib
> > \src\core
> > \src\demo
> > \src\contrib\
> > \src\core\
> > \src\demo\
> >
> >
> > Test Projects:
> >
> > \test
> > \test\contrib
> > \test\core
> > \test\demo
> > \test\contrib\
> > \test\core\
> > \test\demo\
> >
> >
> > Product Documentation:
> >
> > \doc
> > \doc\contrib
> > \doc\core
> > \doc\demo
> > \doc\contrib\
> > \doc\core\
> > \doc\demo\
> >
> >
> > Third-Party Dependencies:
> >
> > \lib
> > \lib\
> > \lib\\
> > \lib\\\
> >
> >
> > Binary Builds:
> >
> > \bin
> > \bin\contrib
> > \bin\core
> > \bin\demo
> > \bin\contrib\
> > \bin\core\
> > \bin\demo\
> > 		 	   		  
Mime
View raw message