lucenenet-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Hans Merkl ...@hmerkl.com>
Subject Re: [Lucene.Net] [VOTE] Fork Sharpen
Date Sat, 05 Mar 2011 03:01:19 GMT
Wouldn't it be better to make such a decision only after it has shown that
working with db4o doesn't work well?

On Fri, Mar 4, 2011 at 03:57, Prescott Nasser <geobmx540@hotmail.com> wrote:

>
> +1 great name. I agree, we will probably need to make changes that are not
> generic enough for them.
>
>
>
>
> > Date: Fri, 4 Mar 2011 00:54:17 -0800
> > Subject: [Lucene.Net] [VOTE] Fork Sharpen
> >
> > Hey All,
> >
> > The discussion on Sharpen or other porting tools has been quiet so I
> think
> > its time for a vote. Background info here:
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-380
> >
> > I propose forking Sharpen outside of ASF for use in our conversion and
> any
> > other java project.
> >
> > The company that created Sharpen (db4o) could accept patches however I
> fear
> > that the scope of our changes will be large enough that our goals will
> not
> > align with db4o's and using their trunk would be a burden. Also hopefully
> > the fork project could attract more attention and contributions than the
> > current obscure repository.
> >
> > Vote will be open for 72 hours.
> > Suggestions on where to host the fork and name for the fork encouraged.
> >
> > My name pick: Grindstone
> > (as in what you use to sharpen)
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Alex
> >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message