lucenenet-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Ayende Rahien <aye...@ayende.com>
Subject Re: [Lucene.Net] Creating a Strong Named Assembly as part of our release
Date Tue, 22 Feb 2011 05:41:22 GMT
Please avoid doing that, it would result in two assemblies, built against
the same version of lucene.net being unable to operate, since each uses a
different snk.
See log4net 1.0.9 and 1.0.10 fiasco for how much problems this can cause.

On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 7:09 AM, Stefan Bodewig <bodewig@apache.org> wrote:

> On 2011-02-21, Troy Howard wrote:
>
> > If we keep the key private, how do we then manage it? Is there a place
> > to store these kinds of resources, where only the committers have
> > access?
>
> If this is the route you wanted to go it would be easy to set up an svn
> area that only committers had read access to.
>
> Stefan
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message