lucenenet-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Sergey Mirvoda <ser...@mirvoda.com>
Subject Re: Luke.Net
Date Fri, 18 Feb 2011 14:08:11 GMT
Alternatively we can reimplement it from scratch.
Using Aarron's code as a working prototype.
Also looks like my most wished (and somewhat advanced) features (testing
Analizers and Luke plugins) is not implemented.

On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 5:01 PM, Aaron Powell <me@aaron-powell.com> wrote:

> Yeah I'm actually quite lax about remembering to put license on my code.
> I've just thrown up the MIT license on it.
>
> I'll speak to my colleague, but I know I didn't work on it during work time
>
> Aaron Powell
> Umbraco Core Team Member | FunnelWeb Team Member
>
> http://www.aaron-powell.com | http://twitter.com/slace | Skype:
> aaron.l.powell | MSN: aazzap@hotmail.com
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Stefan Bodewig [mailto:bodewig@apache.org]
> Sent: Friday, 18 February 2011 10:50 PM
> To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Luke.Net
>
> On 2011-02-18, Troy Howard wrote:
>
> > Sergey is already planning to include the Apache License header in the
> > files when he imports them. Other than that, is there any legal
> > process we need to go through to bring this code into the Lucene.Net
> > fold?
>
> Yes, absolutely.
>
> First of all you can't change the license without Aaron's consent - and
> that of all other people who have contributed to Luke.NET so far (I'm
> assuming it is just Aaron's colleague).  I've just performed a cursory look
> right now and can't find any information about Luke.NET's current license.
>
> Second we'd need a software grant by Aaron and his colleague.
> Alternatively Aaron and his colleague could sign ICLAs but for complete
> code imports a sofware grant is preferred.  See <
> http://www.apache.org/licenses/>.  If the code was created on company time
> Aaron may need to check with his employer and have the employer sign a SGA
> or CCLA, but he'll know better than us.
>
> Finally we'd have to follow the IP-Clearance process <
> http://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/index.html> before the code can
> be imported.
>
> Sorry if this sounds a bit like too much legal hassle, but this is the only
> way the ASF can be sure it has all necessary rights to actually distribute
> the code.
>
> Stefan
>



-- 
--Regards, Sergey Mirvoda

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message