lucenenet-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Digy" <digyd...@gmail.com>
Subject RE: svn commit: r1072121 - /incubator/lucene.net/branches/vs2010/
Date Fri, 18 Feb 2011 21:59:50 GMT
Why not having a release targeting 2.0, 3.5 and 4.0, then updating the
project to 4.0
DIGY

-----Original Message-----
From: Sergey Mirvoda [mailto:sergey@mirvoda.com] 
Sent: Friday, February 18, 2011 11:56 PM
To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: svn commit: r1072121 - /incubator/lucene.net/branches/vs2010/

Why with 2.0 and not with 4.0 targeting 2.0?

On Sat, Feb 19, 2011 at 2:54 AM, Wyatt Barnett
<wyatt.barnett@gmail.com>wrote:

> For folks who badly need to compile it, why not just add a batch file
> to build the project. It is one line:
>
> %windir%\Microsoft.NET\Framework\v2.0.50727\msbuild lucene.net.csproj
> /t:Clean;Rebuild /p:Configuration=Release
>
> On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 4:38 PM, Troy Howard <thoward37@gmail.com> wrote:
> > It's a common practice for developers to create a branch to work on a
> > new feature, then merge that branch back into trunk later when the
> > changes are complete, then delete the branch.
> >
> > The goal is to ensure that incremental commits, performed now against
> > the branch instead of trunk, don't leave trunk in a incompatible,
> > unstable or un-buildable state.
> >
> > Perhaps that's Prescott's intention with the new vs2010 branch?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Troy
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 1:31 PM, Sergey Mirvoda <sergey@mirvoda.com>
> wrote:
> >> +1 for only one trunk upgraded to VS2010
> >>
> >> On Sat, Feb 19, 2011 at 2:27 AM, Lombard, Scott <
> slombard@kingindustries.com
> >>> wrote:
> >>
> >>> I agree with DIGY.
> >>>
> >>> Although why wait until after the official release?
> >>>
> >>> Scott
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> -----Original Message-----
> >>> From: Digy [mailto:digydigy@gmail.com]
> >>> Sent: Friday, February 18, 2011 3:38 PM
> >>> To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org
> >>> Subject: RE: svn commit: r1072121 - /incubator/
> lucene.net/branches/vs2010/
> >>>
> >>> Do we really need a VS2010 branch?. Since there isn't any release
since
> >>> v2.0 and people have to compile the source by yourselves it has been
> good to
> >>> support older versions of VS. But after having an offical release, we
> could
> >>> update the trunk to support VS2010.
> >>>
> >>> Now for each change in trunk (for v2.9.3, 2.9.4 & 2.9.5) we have to
> update
> >>> another repository also.
> >>>
> >>> DIGY
> >>>
> >>> -----Original Message-----
> >>> From: pnasser@apache.org [mailto:pnasser@apache.org]
> >>> Sent: Friday, February 18, 2011 10:11 PM
> >>> To: lucene-net-commits@lucene.apache.org
> >>> Subject: svn commit: r1072121 - /incubator/lucene.net/branches/vs2010/
> >>>
> >>> Author: pnasser
> >>> Date: Fri Feb 18 20:10:54 2011
> >>> New Revision: 1072121
> >>>
> >>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1072121&view=rev
> >>> Log: (empty)
> >>>
> >>> Added:
> >>>    incubator/lucene.net/branches/vs2010/
> >>>      - copied from r1069573, incubator/lucene.net/trunk/
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> This message (and any associated files) is intended only for the
> >>> use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed and may
> >>> contain information that is confidential, subject to copyright or
> >>> constitutes a trade secret. If you are not the intended recipient
> >>> you are hereby notified that any dissemination, copying or
> >>> distribution of this message, or files associated with this message,
> >>> is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error,
> >>> please notify us immediately by replying to the message and deleting
> >>> it from your computer.  Thank you, King Industries, Inc.
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> --Regards, Sergey Mirvoda
> >>
> >
>



-- 
--Regards, Sergey Mirvoda


Mime
View raw message