lucenenet-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Neal Granroth (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] Commented: (LUCENENET-380) Evaluate Sharpen as a port tool
Date Wed, 08 Dec 2010 19:08:02 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-380?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12969427#action_12969427
] 

Neal Granroth commented on LUCENENET-380:
-----------------------------------------

I had looked them over several weeks ago, but had no additional comment than the one you'd
made about needing to find a way to eliminate conversions which make use of Sharpen-specific
classes.  Hopefully others with a larger stake than I in keeping the project alive will chime
in.


> Evaluate Sharpen as a port tool
> -------------------------------
>
>                 Key: LUCENENET-380
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-380
>             Project: Lucene.Net
>          Issue Type: Task
>            Reporter: George Aroush
>         Attachments: 3.0.2_JavaToCSharpConverter_AfterPostProcessing.zip, 3.0.2_JavaToCSharpConverter_NoPostProcessing.zip,
IndexWriter.java, Lucene.Net.Sharpen20101104.zip, Lucene.Net.Sharpen20101114.zip, NIOFSDirectory.java,
QueryParser.java, TestBufferedIndexInput.java, TestDateFilter.java
>
>
> This task is to evaluate Sharpen as a port tool for Lucene.Net.
> The files to be evaluated are attached.  We need to run those files (which are off Java
Lucene 2.9.2) against Sharpen and compare the result against JLCA result.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.


Mime
View raw message