lucenenet-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Prescott Nasser <geobmx...@hotmail.com>
Subject RE: Porting Automation - Sharpen
Date Wed, 10 Nov 2010 06:34:27 GMT

If it spins up a VM just for conversion purposes, does performance matter much? It'll just
be one of us converting it. If it has less pre / post work to convert correctly to a buildable
solution, the extra overhead to convert is probably less painful.


~Prescott Nasser



 
> From: me@aaron-powell.com
> Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2010 17:25:18 +1100
> Subject: Re: Porting Automation - Sharpen
> To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org
> 
> What's the performance of IKVM? I'm skeptical about having to spin up a Java
> VM inside .NET and the kind of overhead that that would produce
> Aaron Powell
> Umbraco Ninja
> 
> http://www.aaron-powell.com | http://twitter.com/slace | Skype:
> aaron.l.powell | MSN: aazzap@hotmail.com
> 
> 
> On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 5:10 PM, Ryan Hoffman <rhoffman@tntp.org> wrote:
> 
> > Hey Guys,
> >
> > I'm loving all the recent activity on the dev list. I've been watching it
> > for some time, and I was also deeply disturbed seeing no posts. This is my
> > first message on the list :).
> >
> > I see that you are evaluating Sharpen. I was wondering if you've heard of
> > IKVM, it's a Java VM that runs on top of .NET/Mono and it also includes a
> > tool which can be used to convert java libraries/apps to .NET assemblies.
> > Check it out at: http://www.ikvm.net/. If this works, it promises to be
> > a very reliable way to convert the official java distribution to .NET.
> >
> > I will give this a shot soon and report back!
> >
> > Ryan Hoffman
> > Software Architect
> > The New Teacher Project
> > www.tntp.org
> >
> > Evaluation systems are broken - so how do we fix them? Teacher Evaluation
> > 2.0 - http://tntp.org/eval2.0
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Aaron Powell [mailto:me@aaron-powell.com]
> > Sent: Thursday, November 04, 2010 10:25 PM
> > To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: Porting Automation - Sharpen
> >
> > Nice work Alex with getting the ball rolling.
> >
> > I've decided to chuck the contents of that ZIP onto bitbucket (I hope you
> > don't mind) since it'll be easier to track the testing against it than
> > through an email. It's available here:
> > http://hg.slace.biz/lucene-via-sharpen
> > This is the raw package contents from Alex, I'll do some updates to it so
> > that it's not tied to Alex's setup and works more generically (unless
> > someone beats me to it) over the weekend
> >
> > <http://hg.slace.biz/lucene-via-sharpen>Note: This is NOT an attempt to
> > move away from ASF, it's just a way for us to test out how well Sharpen
> > performs as a tool for Java to .NET conversion, if it turns out to be a
> > viable option this will be rolled back to ASF. This is just a playground :)
> >
> > Aaron Powell
> > Umbraco Ninja
> >
> > http://www.aaron-powell.com | http://twitter.com/slace | Skype:
> > aaron.l.powell | MSN: aazzap@hotmail.com
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 12:52 PM, Alex Thompson <pierogitus@hotmail.com
> > >wrote:
> >
> > > I did an initial run of Lucene 3.0.2 through Sharpen. It stops when there
> > > is
> > > an error or finds something it doesn't have a mapping for. I added some
> > > placeholder mappings so it would at least get through a few files.
> > >
> > > Here is a package of what I have so far:
> > > http://convid.com/alex/lucene/Lucene.Net.Sharpen20101104.zip
> > >
> > > It contains the C# files from the test run, the jars for Sharpen, and my
> > > Ant
> > > script with the custom mappings. I encourage others to look at the code
> > and
> > > try sharpen. You can use my script to get started.
> > >
> > > Alex
> > >
> > >
> >
 		 	   		  
Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message