lucenenet-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Ayende Rahien <aye...@ayende.com>
Subject Re: Lucere project announcement
Date Fri, 12 Nov 2010 00:21:09 GMT
We had to deal with that in the NH project, it isn't that hard to keep up

On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 11:53 PM, Hans Merkl <hm@hmerkl.com> wrote:

> Keep in mind that Java Lucene is being developed actively. Once you
> start to optimize for .NET, it will become harder and harder to keep
> up with future Java Lucene development.
>
> Whats does MPS do that may be useful for Lucene.NET?
>
> On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 14:54, Karell Ste-Marie <stemarie@brain-bank.com>
> wrote:
> > I have done no other past contribution other than use the product,
> >
> > Can I be reminded, once again, why we don't use the .NET Optimized
> > approaches instead of doing a straight code-code port?
> >
> > I understand that the whole purpose of the project is to be a Lucene
> > port to .NET, but should we not at some point in time optimize more for
> > .NET than just continue to try and port more Java to .NET code? From
> > Scratch? Each and every version?
> >
> > It seems to be that if that is the approach then perhaps it would be
> > time better spent to look into a tool such as MPS
> > (http://www.jetbrains.com/mps/) and then use the source java language
> > through this which would product .NET code on the other side.
> >
> > Or perhaps I've just managed to place a size-12 foot in my mouth because
> > the current process is actually almost exactly this today?
> >
> > Comments welcome...
> >
> >
> >
> > Karell Ste-Marie
> > C.I.O. - BrainBank Inc
> > (514) 636-6655
> >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message