lucenenet-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Hans Merkl ...@hmerkl.com>
Subject Re: Porting Automation - Sharpen
Date Wed, 10 Nov 2010 17:51:33 GMT
I remember reading that IKVM is about 10% slower than Lucene.NET. Somewhere
else I saw that the performance was even with Lucene.NET. For me definitely
not a showstopper.
And if the performance is a showstopper I'd rather put the resources into
improving IKVM.

On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 10:47, Ryan Hoffman <rhoffman@tntp.org> wrote:

> I would say that performance is paramount, and I'm assuming that everyone
> else would agree.  I think it's a great idea to try both IKVM and Sharpen
> and then make a few benchmarks that we compare both.
>
> Ryan Hoffman
> Software Architect
> The New Teacher Project
> www.tntp.org
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message