lucenenet-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Andy Pook (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] Created: (LUCENENET-340) Fieldable.ReaderValue should return TextReader not StreamReader
Date Tue, 09 Feb 2010 18:07:28 GMT
Fieldable.ReaderValue should return TextReader not StreamReader
---------------------------------------------------------------

                 Key: LUCENENET-340
                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-340
             Project: Lucene.Net
          Issue Type: Bug
            Reporter: Andy Pook
            Priority: Minor


Using the more abstract type makes creating custome Fieldables easier as they can use other
TextReader descendants (such as StringReader).
Internally the main use seems to be from DocInverterPerField (eg line 125) where it is used
via a local member of type TextReader.

The original Java uses the abstract Reader type. Is there a reason why the dotNet conversion
uses StreamReader here while using TextReader elsewhere?

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.


Mime
View raw message