lucenenet-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Michael Garski <mgar...@myspace-inc.com>
Subject RE: 2.9 version
Date Tue, 10 Nov 2009 03:13:51 GMT
Great!  I've been working off of the 2.9.1 tag when I need to compare to the original Java.

Michael

-----Original Message-----
From: George Aroush [mailto:george@aroush.net] 
Sent: Monday, November 09, 2009 7:12 PM
To: lucene-net-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: RE: 2.9 version

Hi Michael,

What's in SVN is based on 2.9.0.  I expect by tomorrow night or so to port
in the changes of 2.9.1 at which point, our SVN trunk will be to based on
2.9.1 -- in effect we are skipping 2.9.0.

I will send an email once I have it into SVN.

Thanks.

-- George

-----Original Message-----
From: Michael Garski [mailto:mgarski@myspace-inc.com] 
Sent: Monday, November 09, 2009 12:38 PM
To: lucene-net-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: 2.9 version

One more question... J

 

What version are we targeting for the port?  2.9.0 or 2.9.1?  I use
Eclipse and the tagged Java versions to understand what each of the
methods is doing internally in order to optimize them for .Net and want
to make sure we're all looking at the same version.

 

Cheers,

 

Michael

 

Michael Garski

Sr. Search Architect 

310.969.7435 (office)

310.251.6355 (mobile)

www.myspace.com/michaelgarski

 



Mime
View raw message