lucenenet-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "George Aroush" <geo...@aroush.net>
Subject RE: Apache Lucene.Net 2.9.0 build 001 "Alpha" is now committed
Date Mon, 26 Oct 2009 12:27:30 GMT
Fixed.  Renamed "Payload" to "Payloads".  Thanks for being the first to try
this out.

-- George

-----Original Message-----
From: xzxz@mail.ru [mailto:xzxz@mail.ru] 
Sent: Monday, October 26, 2009 7:26 AM
To: lucene-net-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: Apache Lucene.Net 2.9.0 build 001 "Alpha" is now committed

Hi,

Src does not compile out of the box: 
folder Payloads - does not exist, what does exists - folder Payload 
(without ending s)
Please,  rename  search/payload -> search/payloads

Andrei

George Aroush wrote:
> Hi Folks,
>
>  
>
> If you are watching lucene-net-commits<AT>incubator.apache.org you will
> noticed that I just committed Apache Lucene.Net 2.9.0 build 001 "Alpha".
> This is a port of src\Demo\* and src\Lucene.Net\*.  I was hoping to also
> include src\Test\* but it's not ready yet (I got tied up with family
> commitment over this weekend to wrap it up).  However, it's very close and
I
> expect to deliver it by next weekend.
>
>  
>
> Before my delivery of 2.9.0 code base, I tagged 2.4.0, and updated few
files
> in it.  I also generated MSDN style documentation for it.  You can find it
> in tags\Lucene.Net_2_4_0\*
>
>  
>
> As for 2.9.0, indexing and searching works but not necessarily bug free,
so
> feel free to give it a shot and report back with issues and fixes via
JIRA.
> As in the past, I flagged port issues with {{Aroush-2.9}} (as well as
> Debug.Fail() to catch run-time port issues).  The majority of those port
> issues are either none-issues, or minor.  However, for now, I like to
leave
> them in for sanity check until when I get the test code ported.
>
>  
>
> Also, if you are following Apache Java Lucene, you will notice that there
is
> a major issue with 2.9.0
(https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1974)
> This prompted the need to release of 2.9.1 which may happen next week or
so.
> This means, once 2.9.1 is release, we have to adopt it too -- the port of
> 2.9.1 should be minor and I'm thinking to role it up into 2.9.0.  E.g.:
> switch over to 2.9.1 rather than release Apache Lucene.Net 2.9.0 followed
> with Apache Lucene.Net 2.9.1.
>
>  
>
> Finally, any further communication about port progress, I will confine
them
> to lucene-net-dev@ mailing list only and I ask that we all do the same
> moving forward.  This way, we don't pollute the mailing list (I always
used
> both mailing list because we were a small community, but we are past that
> now).
>
>  
>
> That's it for now.  So take 2.9.0 for a spin, and report back!
>
>  
>
> Thanks.
>
>  
>
> -- George
>
>
>   


Mime
View raw message