lucenenet-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Digy (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] Closed: (LUCENENET-192) Latest SVN build is about twice as slow running queries when compared to Java Lucene
Date Wed, 14 Oct 2009 16:35:31 GMT

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-192?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]

Digy closed LUCENENET-192.
--------------------------

    Resolution: Invalid
      Assignee: Digy

Hi Jeff,

I will close this issue, since I think it is related with how and how many results you are
gathering.
If you are sure, don't hasitate to reopen it.

DIGY

> Latest SVN build is about twice as slow running queries when compared to Java Lucene
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: LUCENENET-192
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-192
>             Project: Lucene.Net
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>         Environment: Visual Studio 2008 with .NET framework 3.5
>            Reporter: Jeff Johnson
>            Assignee: Digy
>            Priority: Minor
>
> I have been using the java luke tool for comparing query times with java vs C# and the
java query time is consistantly about twice as fast as the C# query time. The index I am testing
was built in C# and contains 10 million documents. I have made sure to "warm up" the index
by running the same query a few times before timing it again.
> One example: Querying for a term that exists in every document takes about 1.3 seconds
in C# and 0.6 seconds in java. The total size of my index directory is about 1 GB.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.


Mime
View raw message