lucenenet-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "George Aroush" <geo...@aroush.net>
Subject RE: Apache Lucene.Net 2.9.0 build 001 "Alpha" is now committed
Date Tue, 27 Oct 2009 11:00:23 GMT
Then you must have over looked this:

>>> This is a port of src\Demo\* and src\Lucene.Net\*.  I was hoping to also
>>> include src\Test\* but it's not ready yet (I got tied up with family

I.e.: src\Test\* is not committed yet; it is still based on 2.4.0 so don't
bother to look into it for now.

-- George

-----Original Message-----
From: xzxz@mail.ru [mailto:xzxz@mail.ru] 
Sent: Tuesday, October 27, 2009 2:21 AM
To: lucene-net-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: Apache Lucene.Net 2.9.0 build 001 "Alpha" is now committed


>   I don't see how / why you run into
> this issue.  
I run into this issue when I tried to build test project (src/test).

George Aroush wrote:
> The files that you listed in #1, and #2, are depreciated.  Here is the
> complete list:
>  
> 	\src\Lucene.Net\Index\DirectoryIndexReader.cs
> 	\src\Lucene.Net\Index\MultiSegmentReader.cs
> 	\src\Lucene.Net\Index\ReadOnlyMultiSegmentReader.cs
> 	\src\Lucene.Net\Index\StoredFieldsWriterPerField.cs
> 	\src\Lucene.Net\Index\StoredFieldWriterPerThread.cs
> 	\src\Lucene.Net\Search\Spans\NearSpans.cs
> 	\src\Lucene.Net\Search\Spans\PayloadSpans.cs
> 	\src\Lucene.Net\Search\ExtendedFieldCacheImpl.cs
> 	\src\Lucene.Net\Search\NonMatchingScorer.cs
> 	\src\Lucene.Net\Search\RemoteCachingWrapperFilter.cs
> 	\src\Lucene.Net\Search\RemoteSearchable.cs
>
> I need to remove them from 2.9.0 but for now, I tend to keep them around
> till when I get the test code committed.  I don't see how / why you run
into
> this issue.  Those files are not part of VS build project, so they should
> not have effected you (unless if you have your own build system that pulls
> in every file, do you?).
>
> -- George
>
>   
> -----Original Message-----
> From: xzxz@mail.ru [mailto:xzxz@mail.ru] 
> Sent: Monday, October 26, 2009 3:47 PM
> To: lucene-net-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Apache Lucene.Net 2.9.0 build 001 "Alpha" is now committed
>
> Thanks a lot.
>
> Found so far:
> 1) search/Spans/PayloadSpans.cs - is not included in the project file 
> (Lucene.Net). In order to compile one has to change PayloadSpans from 
> interface to an abstract class (PayloadSpans : Spans, but Spans is 
> declared as abstract class). Or alternativly Spans has to be an  
> interface, but it will require many changes in other source code. Is 
> there particular reasons to have Spans as abstract class rather than 
> interface (I don't see any implementation code in Spans)?
>
> 2) search/RemoteCachingWrapperFilter.cs
>     search/RemoteSearchable.cs
>
>  - are  not included in the project Lucene.Net file.
> ---
> Andrei
>
> George Aroush wrote:
>   
>> Fixed.  Renamed "Payload" to "Payloads".  Thanks for being the first to
>>     
> try
>   
>> this out.
>>
>> -- George
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: xzxz@mail.ru [mailto:xzxz@mail.ru] 
>> Sent: Monday, October 26, 2009 7:26 AM
>> To: lucene-net-dev@incubator.apache.org
>> Subject: Re: Apache Lucene.Net 2.9.0 build 001 "Alpha" is now committed
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Src does not compile out of the box: 
>> folder Payloads - does not exist, what does exists - folder Payload 
>> (without ending s)
>> Please,  rename  search/payload -> search/payloads
>>
>> Andrei
>>
>> George Aroush wrote:
>>   
>>     
>>> Hi Folks,
>>>
>>>  
>>>
>>> If you are watching lucene-net-commits<AT>incubator.apache.org you will
>>> noticed that I just committed Apache Lucene.Net 2.9.0 build 001 "Alpha".
>>> This is a port of src\Demo\* and src\Lucene.Net\*.  I was hoping to also
>>> include src\Test\* but it's not ready yet (I got tied up with family
>>> commitment over this weekend to wrap it up).  However, it's very close
>>>       
> and
>   
>>>     
>>>       
>> I
>>   
>>     
>>> expect to deliver it by next weekend.
>>>
>>>  
>>>
>>> Before my delivery of 2.9.0 code base, I tagged 2.4.0, and updated few
>>>     
>>>       
>> files
>>   
>>     
>>> in it.  I also generated MSDN style documentation for it.  You can find
>>>       
> it
>   
>>> in tags\Lucene.Net_2_4_0\*
>>>
>>>  
>>>
>>> As for 2.9.0, indexing and searching works but not necessarily bug free,
>>>     
>>>       
>> so
>>   
>>     
>>> feel free to give it a shot and report back with issues and fixes via
>>>     
>>>       
>> JIRA.
>>   
>>     
>>> As in the past, I flagged port issues with {{Aroush-2.9}} (as well as
>>> Debug.Fail() to catch run-time port issues).  The majority of those port
>>> issues are either none-issues, or minor.  However, for now, I like to
>>>     
>>>       
>> leave
>>   
>>     
>>> them in for sanity check until when I get the test code ported.
>>>
>>>  
>>>
>>> Also, if you are following Apache Java Lucene, you will notice that
there
>>>     
>>>       
>> is
>>   
>>     
>>> a major issue with 2.9.0
>>>     
>>>       
>> (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1974)
>>   
>>     
>>> This prompted the need to release of 2.9.1 which may happen next week or
>>>     
>>>       
>> so.
>>   
>>     
>>> This means, once 2.9.1 is release, we have to adopt it too -- the port
of
>>> 2.9.1 should be minor and I'm thinking to role it up into 2.9.0.  E.g.:
>>> switch over to 2.9.1 rather than release Apache Lucene.Net 2.9.0
followed
>>> with Apache Lucene.Net 2.9.1.
>>>
>>>  
>>>
>>> Finally, any further communication about port progress, I will confine
>>>     
>>>       
>> them
>>   
>>     
>>> to lucene-net-dev@ mailing list only and I ask that we all do the same
>>> moving forward.  This way, we don't pollute the mailing list (I always
>>>     
>>>       
>> used
>>   
>>     
>>> both mailing list because we were a small community, but we are past
that
>>> now).
>>>
>>>  
>>>
>>> That's it for now.  So take 2.9.0 for a spin, and report back!
>>>
>>>  
>>>
>>> Thanks.
>>>
>>>  
>>>
>>> -- George
>>>
>>>
>>>   
>>>     
>>>       
>>   
>>     
>
>
>
>   



Mime
View raw message