lucenenet-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Ben Martz" <benma...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: TestRemoteSearchable and random port
Date Tue, 13 Jan 2009 05:55:45 GMT
I'm glad that worked out, TJ. Sorry that my original post was unclear.
Thanks for tackling the issue!

On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 6:31 PM, TJ Kolev <tjkolev@gmail.com> wrote:

> I just finished trying HttpChannel(0) :) I initially misread Ben's
> suggestion and he and you are correct: HttpChannel(0) does give you an
> available port. The HttpChannel() I used is of not much use.
>
> Another improvement I found while testing. The port variable is not
> needed (unless we decide to report on it). This works instead:
>
>                private static Lucene.Net.Search.Searchable LookupRemote()
>                {
>                        //return
> (Lucene.Net.Search.Searchable)Activator.GetObject(typeof(Lucene.Net.Search.Searchable),
> string.Format("http://localhost:{0}/RemoteSearchable", port));
>
>                        return
> (Lucene.Net.Search.Searchable)Activator.GetObject(typeof(Lucene.Net.Search.Searchable),
> httpChannel.GetUrlsForUri("RemoteSearchable")[0]);
>                }
>
>
> I will make a jira and attach a patch.
>
> tjk :)
>
>
-- 
13:37 - Someone stole the precinct toilet. The cops have nothing to go on.
14:37 - Officers dispatched to a daycare where a three-year-old was
resisting a rest.
21:11 - Hole found in nudist camp wall. Officers are looking into it.

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message