lucenenet-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Doug Sale" <dougs...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Committer status
Date Mon, 04 Aug 2008 17:49:36 GMT
Erik,

Thanks.  I appreciate the support.  Of course I expect that we should be put
to a vote.  It is my understanding that all decision-making, etc, should
happen on public lists.  Thus, I didn't feel that I should make my appeal to
George privately.

Doug

On Mon, Aug 4, 2008 at 12:45 PM, Erik Hatcher <erik@ehatchersolutions.com>wrote:

> Doug - that's a bit of an unconventional way to get commit privileges to an
> Apache project.  George really should propose you, and Digy (though
> separately) as committers, and then there is a vote.
>
> For the record, I'm +1 on you both joining this project as committers
> though.
>
> George - at your discretion, please make an official VOTE proposal for
> each.  I guess it's just George and I with binding votes here, but let's do
> it the usual way for posterity :)
>
>        Erik
>
>
> On Aug 4, 2008, at 1:33 PM, Doug Sale wrote:
>
>  George,
>>
>> I am writing to request that Digy and I are made committers as soon as
>> possible.  It is a practical matter.  Maintaining a separate codebase
>> locally and adding and removing patches is time-consuming and error-prone
>> when dealing with many deltas.  Especially, for myself, considering that I
>> have begun to port the changes from the 2.3.2 release as well - it's a
>> juggling act.  I bet that we each have a different version of the code on
>> our local machines.  SVN access will simplify this process, and we will
>> all
>> be assured of working on the latest code at any given time.  Your role as
>> gatekeeper will still apply, and any unwarranted commits may simply be
>> rolled back.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Doug
>>
>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message