lucenenet-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "George Aroush" <geo...@aroush.net>
Subject RE: Apache Lucene.Net 2.1 build 002 "Beta" released
Date Sun, 12 Aug 2007 00:03:09 GMT
Hi Joe,

It is a merge, so it make sense (and life easier) to fix the existing NUnit
issues before we move on.  Sorry, for not making this clear.

Regards,

-- George

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Joe Shaw [mailto:joe@joeshaw.org] 
> Sent: Saturday, August 11, 2007 7:35 PM
> To: lucene-net-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Cc: lucene-net-user@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Apache Lucene.Net 2.1 build 002 "Beta" released
> 
> Hi,
> 
> On 8/11/07, George Aroush <george@aroush.net> wrote:
> > I agree, and I see little value to have a full release of 2.1.  
> > However, before we start working on 2.2, we should fix the existing 
> > known issues with
> > 2.1 that NUnit tests has exposed; doing so will make the 
> transition to 
> > 2.2 must easier.  If we take this path, then we can leave 2.1 in a 
> > "non-supported" mode and move on to 2.2.  Does everyone agree?
> 
> When new versions of Lucene.Net made, are they merges of the 
> changes from the previous Java version (converted somehow), 
> or are they totally new conversions with some of the 
> .Net-isms merged in?  If the former, this definitely makes 
> sense.  If the latter, I would think it makes more sense to 
> skip 2.1 entirely.
> 
> In any case, moving forward on either front is positive news. 
>  Keep up the good work. :)
> 
> Joe
> 


Mime
View raw message