lucenenet-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "DIGY" <digyd...@gmail.com>
Subject RE: Status of Lucene.Net 2.1
Date Mon, 27 Aug 2007 16:08:20 GMT
Hi George,

I don't get any failure in NUnit test of
Lucene.Net.Index.TestNorms._TestNorms.
(Reverse case for
Search.TestDisjunctionMaxQuery.TestBooleanOptionalWithTiebreaker:-) where I
get errors)

DIGY



-----Original Message-----
From: George Aroush [mailto:george@aroush.net] 
Sent: Monday, August 27, 2007 6:22 AM
To: lucene-net-dev@incubator.apache.org;
lucene-net-user@incubator.apache.org
Subject: RE: Status of Lucene.Net 2.1

Hi again,

In regards to the 2 remaining tests that are still failing, those are:

	Lucene.Net.Index.TestNorms._TestNorms()
	Lucene.Net.Store.TestLockFactory.TestLockClassProperty() 

-- George


> -----Original Message-----
> From: George Aroush [mailto:george@aroush.net] 
> Sent: Sunday, August 26, 2007 11:19 PM
> To: lucene-net-user@incubator.apache.org; 
> lucene-net-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Status of Lucene.Net 2.1
> 
> Hi folks,
> 
> As you may recall, I released the port of Lucene.Net 2.1's 
> NUnit code base on Aug 11.  In a little over 2 weeks, thanks 
> to the huge effort of DIGGY and Jeff (sorry guys, I don't 
> have your full name), the number of NUnit test failure has 
> been reduced from 230 to 2!  Thanks to 35 different patches!!
> 
> This is a great achievement and soon we should be able to 
> label 2.1 as "final" and move on to 2.2 and catch up with the 
> Java version of Lucene.
> 
> Regards,
> 
> -- George Aroush
> 


Mime
View raw message