lucenenet-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "George Aroush" <geo...@aroush.net>
Subject RE: Lucene.Net version to get
Date Fri, 13 Apr 2007 12:20:25 GMT
Hi James,

My original plan was to get an early alpha release over this past weekend,
but it didn't happen.  I will see if I can make it over this coming weekend.

Regards,

-- George 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Shaw, James [mailto:James_Shaw@intuit.com] 
> Sent: Thursday, April 12, 2007 5:51 PM
> To: lucene-net-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: RE: Lucene.Net version to get
> 
> Thanks George for the info.
> 
> Also When do you think an official build for .NET 2.0 is 
> coming out (w/o all the warnings you have when you convert it 
> to .NET 2.0 right now)?
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: George Aroush [mailto:george@aroush.net]
> Sent: Tuesday, April 10, 2007 5:40 PM
> To: lucene-net-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: RE: Lucene.Net version to get
> 
> Hi James,
> 
> A while back, I re-packaged this release as build 4.  It is 
> currently staged
> here: http://people.apache.org/~aroush/Lucene.Net-2.0-004/ 
> and I'm still waiting for three +1 binding votes.  So far I 
> only got 1 +1 vote.  I don't know why, but it seems to be 
> taking a while.  I just submitted another reminder to the 
> PMC, lets hope it gets on their radar this time.
> 
> Erik: if you can help, please do so.
> 
> James: If you are currently using build 3, then 4 is 99% the 
> same.  And yes, 2.0 is backward compatible with 1.9.x on the 
> index side of things.
> However,
> 2.0 has removed depreciated APIs.
> 
> Regards,
> 
> -- George Aroush
> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Shaw, James [mailto:James_Shaw@intuit.com]
> > Sent: Saturday, April 07, 2007 9:03 PM
> > To: lucene-net-dev@incubator.apache.org
> > Subject: Lucene.Net version to get
> > 
> > George and all,
> > I got the Lucene.Net 2.0 in
> > 
> > Lucene.Net.2.0-003-26Feb27.src.zip
> > 
> > that was posted in
> > 
> > http://incubator.apache.org/lucene.net/download/
> > 
> > but know that it had been pulled for not following Apache voting 
> > process.
> > 
> > Will the same build will re-appear as a stable release soon?  
> > I read from the mailing list it would be Lucene.Net.2.0-004 
> that gets 
> > posted rather than 003?  I guess my main question is if our company 
> > wants to use stable (released to public) build of 
> Lucene.Net 2.0, what 
> > build should we get, and when should we expect it to be available?
> > 
> > Also is Lucene 2.0 backwards compatible with Lucene 1.9.x, 
> i.e., can 
> > 2.0 read index created with 1.9.x?
> > 
> > Thanks in advance for your answers.
> > 
> 


Mime
View raw message