lucenenet-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "George Aroush" <geo...@aroush.net>
Subject RE: Compression Implementation
Date Fri, 12 May 2006 22:00:16 GMT
Hi Johnny,

If by "done the 'Plug-in' pat already" you mean the sample code that you
posted yesterday, then that code can't be used.  Please see my response
earlier today as to why and my suggested solution.

Regards,

-- George Aroush


-----Original Message-----
From: J C [mailto:roamingcode@hotmail.com] 
Sent: Friday, May 12, 2006 10:09 AM
To: lucene-net-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: RE: Compression Implementation
Importance: High


Just let ya folks kno that I hav done the "Plug-in" part already.
My concern is that it is to compromise the statement of "no conifg" from
java version.
Even if we hav to introduce "config", wat kind of format ?

Please clarify and then i can incoporate it accordingly.

Regards
Johnny


>From: "Eyal Post" <eyalpost@epocalipse.com>
>Reply-To: lucene-net-dev@incubator.apache.org
>To: <lucene-net-dev@incubator.apache.org>
>Subject: RE: Compression Implementation
>Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 12:38:42 +0300
>
>I read the section you referenced, but I'm not sure what "compatible" 
>means when it comes to licensing.
>to avoid those licensing issues, I would suggest not to try and 
>incorporate ziplib as is into lucene. Instead, let's declare an 
>interface for zipping and allow adapters to be written for different 
>compression libraries. A good candidate for the contrib section would 
>be a adapter for ziplib. In Lucene 2.0 we'll simply use the compression 
>support from the framework.
>If that sounds ok, then I'll be happy to start working on the 
>infrastructure for this.
>
>Eyal Post
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Erik Hatcher [mailto:erik@ehatchersolutions.com]
> >
> > 	<http://www.apache.org/foundation/licence-FAQ.html#GPL>
> >
> > IANAL, but it is tricky business to blend GPL into an ASF project.
> > IIRC, ASF may not distribute (L)GPLd binaries or source code, but it 
> > is ok to have a dependency that can be plugged in at run-time for 
> > sure.  The trickier part is a more built-in dependency.  I recommend 
> > asking this on the incubator list first and see how others are 
> > handling it before proceeding with any ziplib integration.
> >
> > 	Erik
> >
> >
> > > Regards
> > > Johnny
> > >
> > >
> > >> From: "Eyal Post" <eyalpost@epocalipse.com>
> > >> Reply-To: lucene-net-dev@incubator.apache.org
> > >> To: <lucene-net-dev@incubator.apache.org>
> > >> Subject: RE: Compression Implementation
> > >> Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 08:03:01 +0300
> > >>
> > >> I don't think you can use the #ziplib inside Lucene
> > because they use
> > >> different open source licenses.
> > >>
> > >> Regards,
> > >> Eyal Post
> > >> EPocalipse Software
> > >> http://www.epocalipse.com
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> > -----Original Message-----
> > >> > From: J C [mailto:roamingcode@hotmail.com]
> > >> > Sent: Friday, May 12, 2006 3:02 AM
> > >> > To: lucene-net-dev@incubator.apache.org
> > >> > Subject: RE: Compression Implementation
> > >> > Importance: High
> > >> >
> > >> > Hello George
> > >> >
> > >> > Things are *not* always too bad.
> > >> >
> > >> > Please take a look at the #ziplib which is .net 1.1 compliant.
> > >> >
> > >> > http://www.icsharpcode.net/
> > >> >
> > >> > Im on it now.
> > >> >
> > >> > Cheers
> > >> > Johnny
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> > >From: "George Aroush" <george@aroush.net>
> > >> > >Reply-To: lucene-net-dev@incubator.apache.org
> > >> > >To: <lucene-net-dev@incubator.apache.org>
> > >> > >Subject: RE: Compression Implementation
> > >> > >Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 09:05:15 -0400
> > >> > >
> > >> > >Hi Johnny,
> > >> > >
> > >> > >I have to keep Lucene.Net 1.9 .NET 1.1 compliant.
> > Since .NET 1.1
> > >> > >doesn't have compression API, I couldn't implement this port
> > >> > -- thus, I
> > >> > >left it out.
> > >> > >
> > >> > >My idea on how to resolve this is to use reflection and 
> > >> > >through reflection, one can integrate a 3rd party compression

> > >> > >into
> > >> > Lucene.Net
> > >> > >1.9.  If you want to take on this part, please do and submit
> > >> > your code.
> > >> > >Your effort will be more then welcome and is a path to
> > >> > becoming a committer for Lucene.Net.
> > >> > >
> > >> > >Regards,
> > >> > >
> > >> > >-- George Aroush
> > >> > >
> > >> > >-----Original Message-----
> > >> > >From: J C [mailto:roamingcode@hotmail.com]
> > >> > >Sent: Wednesday, May 10, 2006 7:51 PM
> > >> > >To: lucene-net-dev@incubator.apache.org
> > >> > >Subject: Compression Implementation
> > >> > >Importance: High
> > >> > >
> > >> > >Hello George
> > >> > >
> > >> > >I have found this:
> > >> > >// {{Aroush-1.9}} for .NET 1.1, we can use reflection and ZLib?
> > >> > >in FieldsWriter.cs. It seems that the ZIP compression
> > is not yet
> > >> > >implemented.
> > >> > >
> > >> > >I would like to give it a try. Please confirm.
> > >> > >
> > >> > >Regards
> > >> > >Johnny
> > >> > >
> > >> >
> > >_________________________________________________________________
> > >> > >Be the one of the first to try the NEW Windows Live Mail.
> > >> > >http://ideas.live.com/programPage.aspx?versionId=5d21c51a-b16
> > >> 1-4314-9b0
> > >> >e-491
> > >> >1fb2b2e6d
> > >> >
> > >>
> > >> _________________________________________________________________
> > >> Research and compare new cars side by side at carpoint.com.au 
> > >> http://secure-au.imrworldwide.com/cgi-bin/a/ci_450304/et_2/
> > >> cg_801459/pi_1004
> > >> 813/ai_833884
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >
> > > _________________________________________________________________
> > > Be the one of the first to try the NEW Windows Live Mail. http://
> > > ideas.live.com/programPage.aspx?versionId=5d21c51a-
> > > b161-4314-9b0e-4911fb2b2e6d
> >
> >
> >
>

_________________________________________________________________
Be the one of the first to try the NEW Windows Live Mail. 
http://ideas.live.com/programPage.aspx?versionId=5d21c51a-b161-4314-9b0e-491
1fb2b2e6d


Mime
View raw message