logging-log4cxx-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Dale King" <dalewk...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: A few problems to report
Date Sat, 10 May 2008 03:26:33 GMT
OK, I've figured out why the exception on control-C. The problem is
Thread::join will throw a ThreadException if the apr_thread_join does
not return a 0 status. But in the case of control-C the
apr_thread_join returns a non-zero value and it throws an exception
that no one catches.

On Fri, May 9, 2008 at 9:56 PM, Dale King <dalewking@gmail.com> wrote:
> Ok, I have tried the latest in subversion and yes it works when the
> program exits normally including the annoying wait for the sleep to
> end.
>
> However it does not work when you end the program when you hit
> control-C. I get an exception in that case only when I include my
> XMLSocketAppender. If I remove the XMLSocketAppender ctrl-C exits the
> program normally.
>
> So I would not call it resolved.
>
> What I still find very curious is the fact that none of these problems
> occur with the FileWatchdog thread. What makes these threads so much
> different?
>
> On Fri, May 9, 2008 at 5:50 PM, Curt Arnold <carnold@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>> On May 7, 2008, at 1:28 PM, Dale King wrote:
>>
>>> Any feedback on these issues? I submitted Jira issues on all 3.
>>>
>>> The threads not ending cleanly is a major problem with me trying to
>>> move one component of our system to Log4Cxx. I would at least like to
>>> get a patch for it (preferrably a released version). I've tried
>>> several things but have not found a complete solution and the fact
>>> that it behaves differently than the FileWatchdog thread is confusing.
>>> I'm willing to help out on it, but am interested in your thoughts on
>>> the threading issues since you wrote it.
>>>
>>
>>
>> I've committed several changes against these issues and closed them as
>> resolved.  Obviously it would be good if you could confirm that they address
>> the issues that you encountered.
>>
>> I spun off LOGCXX-282 as a separate issue to allow Thread::sleep() to be
>> woken up by a call to Thread::interrupt().  However, the required added
>> additional member variables to the Thread class which would make the
>> resulting library not binary compatible with log4cxx 0.10.0.  I've held off
>> committing it until I get some other non-breaking changes fixed, but I would
>> appreciate your checking it using the patch file attached to the bug report.
>>  After we get come feedback, we can decide if you want to have a 0.10.1 or a
>> 0.11.0 or both.
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Dale King
>



-- 
Dale King

Mime
View raw message