logging-log4cxx-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Ufuk Kayserilioglu <gro...@paralaus.com>
Subject Re: [VOTE][RECALL] log4cxx 0.10.0-rc2
Date Fri, 29 Feb 2008 10:07:06 GMT
Curt Arnold wrote:
>
> On Feb 27, 2008, at 4:01 AM, Ufuk Kayserilioglu wrote:
>> Thank you for all your efforts in trying to get a 0.10 release out of
>> the door; it was much needed.
>>
>> There is, however, still one issue that we see as very critical on
>> Windows platforms that results in an application hang because of a
>> config reload and has been reported twice to the Dev list and as
>> LOGCXX-246 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOGCXX-246>. The
>> problem stems from a wrong assumption about Thread::stop() method call
>> and the fix, as we have gone about doing it, is very simple to 
>> implement.
>>
>> Could you please consider it for the next RC as well?
>>
>> Many thanks,
>>
>> Ufuk Kayserilioglu
>>
>>
>
>
> Sorry to leave it off the list.  I was writing at the end of a long 
> day.  I did see the bug report minutes after posting RC2.  I haven't 
> had a chance to look at the issue.
>
> My process would be to check:
>
> How similar is the log4j and log4cxx implementations?
> If they are similar is it a flaw in both implementations, or is it a 
> flaw in the emulation of java.lang.Thread?
> How to write a test case that would identify the issue?
>
> I won't be able to look at it for a few more days, so if anyone wants 
> to take a shot at answering those questions, add them as comments to 
> the bug report.
I have just answered these questions in a comment to the bug report. You 
can access it here 
<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOGCXX-246?focusedCommentId=12573657#action_12573657>.

Best regards,

Ufuk Kayserilioglu


Mime
View raw message