logging-log4cxx-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From renny.ko...@rubixinfotech.com
Subject RE: Most stable version of log4cxx?
Date Thu, 06 Dec 2007 15:25:23 GMT
Stephen -

Very good question... I have an offshore dev team who may be able to throw
in some time testing, assuming there are **documented** tests to run.  They
are definitely not too good on "ad-hoc" style testing.


Renny Koshy
President & CEO

RUBIX Information Technologies, Inc.

             <sbartnikowski@ba                                          To 
             rkinglizards.com>         "'Log4CXX User'"                    
             12/06/2007 09:58                                           cc 
                                       RE: Most stable version of log4cxx? 
             Please respond to                                             
              "Log4CXX User"                                               

Hey Curt,

What's the testing process? How do we the users get involved on that and
what sort of committment do we need to make?

I think it's important I eke out some testing time out of my schedule to
help out on that front, since, hey I'm using developer builds of log4cxx on
FreeBSD, openSUSE, SUSE Enterprise, Fedora, Red Hat Enterprise, White Box,
and I want to bring it over to Mac OS X Server.

As for the voting process, is there a process there too? Do we need to
subscribe to general@logging.apache.org to participate?

Thanks for the update!

- Stephen

-----Original Message-----
From: Curt Arnold [mailto:carnold@apache.org]
Sent: Wednesday, December 05, 2007 6:27 PM
To: Log4CXX User
Subject: Re: Most stable version of log4cxx?

On Dec 5, 2007, at 4:09 PM, renny.koshy@rubixinfotech.com wrote:

> I know... I wish I could personally contribute time/energy/
> resources...
> during the project in question we actually hired both omniEvents
> developers full time to 'help out'... but am not in a position right
> now.
> Would putting a "bounty" on it incentivise anyone to help?
> Renny Koshy
> President & CEO

I think we are close enough that getting a new developer ramped up would
likely delay things unless someone wants to take on the ODBC/ DBAppender in
the next week or so.  However, having a configure/ autotools guru on call
could be helpful.  Andreas Fester has done that role in the past and I was
planning on nagging him when doing the release candidate preparation.

Testers checking various build platforms and testing with apps that use
log4cxx 0.9.7 however would be very helpful and timely votes on any release
candidates would be essential to encouraging the LS PMC to support the

View raw message