logging-log4cxx-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Daniel Einspanjer <deinspan...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Questions regarding CVS HEAD
Date Fri, 11 Feb 2005 21:26:12 GMT
Curt, thanks very much for the answer.  Unfortunately, I can only
assume we fit the bill of multithreaded logging since most of our
applications are currently being run inside gSOAP or Tomcat..  I'll be
watching the progress toward 0.9.8 closely.

Thanks!
Daniel


On Fri, 11 Feb 2005 12:42:03 -0600, Curt Arnold <carnold@apache.org> wrote:
> Unless you are immediately jumping into multithreaded logging I would
> recommend using the CVS HEAD over 0.9.7.  Currently the synchronization
> and thread-local stuff is stubbed out.
> 
> The next release will look almost exactly like the current CVS, but
> with more features fleshed out and tested.  I've added a task to Jira
> (http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOGCXX-62) to track the issues
> that are blocking (at least in my opinion) the release.  Please feel
> free to add additional issues or petition to have issues reduced from
> blocking status.
> 
> The CVS HEAD is now being build and tested daily by Gump (Ant build
> only) and any breakage will result in an nag message to the mailing
> list.
> 
> 
> On Feb 11, 2005, at 12:15 PM, Daniel Einspanjer wrote:
> 
> > How stable is the current CVS source?  Is there a roadmap anywhere for
> > a release of .9.8?
> >
> > We're in the early stages of trying to implement log4cxx in our system
> > and I am catching a lot of flak from some of the developers on my team
> > because of problems with static initialization and compilation
> > problems with icc...  I'm hoping that .9.8 is the answer to several of
> > these problems, and I might even be able to work with CVS source for a
> > while if it is relatively stable and close to what .9.8 is going to
> > look like...
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Daniel
> >
> 
>

Mime
View raw message