I think that it is a good idea to hold a vote on this.

Before we do so, I'd like to make sure that all the PMC members are subscribed to the private list.



On Mar 5, 2019, at 6:08 AM, James Bognar <jamesbognar@apache.org> wrote:

We originally held a vote near the beginning of the project to merge
Committer/PMC roles.  It probably wouldn't be a bad idea to hold a new
vote on whether we want to continue that practice as the team grows

On Mon, Mar 4, 2019 at 12:56 PM Steve Blackmon <steve@blackmon.org> wrote:

+1 to this change codifying existing practice

On Mar 4, 2019, 11:14 AM -0600, Craig Russell <apache.clr@gmail.com>, wrote:

So are we all agreed that once we agree to add someone as a committer they also become PMC member?

It would be nice to get a few PMC members to explicitly agree to this, as the documentation is currently a bit ambiguous.


On Mar 4, 2019, at 6:18 AM, James Bognar <jamesbognar@apache.org> wrote:

Yea, it doesn't make sense.  Copy-and-paste from some other document.
It should be changed.

On Fri, Mar 1, 2019 at 5:51 PM Craig Russell <apache.clr@gmail.com> wrote:

I'm reviewing the new member guidelines and have lots of edits. I'll start with the easy one.


The Apache Juneau team does not differentiate between Committers and PMC members.

1. If committer is also to be a PMC member, nominator sends email to board@ asking for acknowledgement of new PMC member

If we do not distinguish between committers and PMC members, how does this sentence make sense?


Craig L Russell

Craig L Russell
Secretary, Apache Software Foundation
clr@apache.org http://db.apache.org/jdo

Craig L Russell
Secretary, Apache Software Foundation
clr@apache.org http://db.apache.org/jdo