I think that it is a good idea to hold a vote on this.

Before we do so, I'd like to make sure that all the PMC members are subscribed to the private list.

https://whimsy.apache.org/roster/committee/juneau

Craig

On Mar 5, 2019, at 6:08 AM, James Bognar <jamesbognar@apache.org> wrote:

We originally held a vote near the beginning of the project to merge
Committer/PMC roles.  It probably wouldn't be a bad idea to hold a new
vote on whether we want to continue that practice as the team grows
larger.
Thoughts?

On Mon, Mar 4, 2019 at 12:56 PM Steve Blackmon <steve@blackmon.org> wrote:

+1 to this change codifying existing practice

Steve
On Mar 4, 2019, 11:14 AM -0600, Craig Russell <apache.clr@gmail.com>, wrote:

So are we all agreed that once we agree to add someone as a committer they also become PMC member?

It would be nice to get a few PMC members to explicitly agree to this, as the documentation is currently a bit ambiguous.

Craig

On Mar 4, 2019, at 6:18 AM, James Bognar <jamesbognar@apache.org> wrote:

Yea, it doesn't make sense.  Copy-and-paste from some other document.
It should be changed.

On Fri, Mar 1, 2019 at 5:51 PM Craig Russell <apache.clr@gmail.com> wrote:


I'm reviewing the new member guidelines and have lots of edits. I'll start with the easy one.

https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/JUNEAU/New+member+guidelines

The Apache Juneau team does not differentiate between Committers and PMC members.

1. If committer is also to be a PMC member, nominator sends email to board@ asking for acknowledgement of new PMC member

If we do not distinguish between committers and PMC members, how does this sentence make sense?

Craig

Craig L Russell
clr@apache.org


Craig L Russell
Secretary, Apache Software Foundation
clr@apache.org http://db.apache.org/jdo


Craig L Russell
Secretary, Apache Software Foundation
clr@apache.org http://db.apache.org/jdo