juneau-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "John D. Ament" <johndam...@apache.org>
Subject Re: Adding BeanProperty to constructor arguments
Date Mon, 09 Jan 2017 15:32:13 GMT
Isn't that what @BeanConstructor is meant for? Choosing the right
constructor to use (when no default constructor exists)?

On Mon, Jan 9, 2017 at 9:33 AM James Bognar <james.bognar@salesforce.com>
wrote:

> I see what you mean.  There may be multiple constructors with different
> arguments.  However, we could find the one with the correct argument
> types.  In the example above, we would be looking for....
>
> public MyBean(int, String);
>
> On Mon, Jan 9, 2017 at 9:27 AM, John D. Ament <johndament@apache.org>
> wrote:
>
> > James,
> >
> > Maybe, however specifically for constructor parsing there are cases where
> > the attribute is passed in but not saved as an attribute.  Right now that
> > type of solution wouldn't work.
> >
> > John
> >
> > On Mon, Jan 9, 2017 at 9:08 AM James Bognar <james.bognar@salesforce.com
> >
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Hi John,
> > >
> > > Do you mean adding an index property on the @BeanProperty annotation
> that
> > > denotes it's constructor parameter index?
> > >
> > > @BeanProperty(constructorIndex=0)
> > > public int foo();
> > >
> > > @BeanProperty(constructorIndex=1)
> > > public String bar();
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Sun, Jan 8, 2017 at 9:39 PM, John D. Ament <johndament@apache.org>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > I was wondering if there was a reason (or maybe equivalent) to using
> > > > @BeanProperty on a constructor argument?  This way on BeanConstructor
> > > > instead of having to list the ordered arguments, the annotation could
> > be
> > > > used to say which field it covered.
> > > >
> > > > John
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > James Bognar
> > >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> James Bognar
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message